Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 26;10(4):eade2780.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade2780. Epub 2024 Jan 26.

Genetic architecture of alcohol consumption identified by a genotype-stratified GWAS and impact on esophageal cancer risk in Japanese people

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Genetic architecture of alcohol consumption identified by a genotype-stratified GWAS and impact on esophageal cancer risk in Japanese people

Yuriko N Koyanagi et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

An East Asian-specific variant on aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2 rs671, G>A) is the major genetic determinant of alcohol consumption. We performed an rs671 genotype-stratified genome-wide association study meta-analysis of alcohol consumption in 175,672 Japanese individuals to explore gene-gene interactions with rs671 behind drinking behavior. The analysis identified three genome-wide significant loci (GCKR, KLB, and ADH1B) in wild-type homozygotes and six (GCKR, ADH1B, ALDH1B1, ALDH1A1, ALDH2, and GOT2) in heterozygotes, with five showing genome-wide significant interaction with rs671. Genetic correlation analyses revealed ancestry-specific genetic architecture in heterozygotes. Of the discovered loci, four (GCKR, ADH1B, ALDH1A1, and ALDH2) were suggested to interact with rs671 in the risk of esophageal cancer, a representative alcohol-related disease. Our results identify the genotype-specific genetic architecture of alcohol consumption and reveal its potential impact on alcohol-related disease risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Manhattan plots of the GWAS of daily alcohol intake.
The results for (A) unstratified, (B) rs671 wild-type homozygotes (GG), (C) rs671 heterozygotes (GA), and (D) interaction with rs671 are shown. The position on each chromosome (x axis) and the observed −log10(P value) (y axis) of all tested genetic variants are shown. The solid red line indicates genome-wide significance level. Blue triangles represent loci containing SNPs with P values of <1 × 10−50. *ADH1B P value (A): 5.89 × 10−91; **ALDH2 P value (A): 8.71 × 10−6987; ADH1B P value (C): 3.12 × 10−101; ALDH1B1 P value (C): 2.00 × 10−54.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Genomic loci reaching genome-wide significance in either analysis for association with daily alcohol intake.
Direction of effects of identified variants other than rs671 is presented as a heatmap. Estimates with a single asterisk show genome-wide significance (P < 5.0 × 10−8). Lead SNP in each locus is highlighted, with its estimates in bold. SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; Ref, reference allele; Alt, alternative allele; freq., frequency; SE, standard error; HetP, P value from test of heterogeneity. rs79463616 was not itself lead SNP in the interaction GWAS, but was in perfect LD with the lead SNP, rs4646777 [β (SE) = −0.127 (0.012), P = 4.45 × 10−27] (r2 = 1.00 in 1KGP-JPT).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. Regional association plots of the identified ALDH2 and GOT2 regions.
Regional association plots for daily alcohol intake in rs671 heterozygotes are shown. The vertical axis indicates the –log10(P value) for the assessment of the association of each SNP with daily alcohol intake. Black line represents genome-wide significance threshold of 5.0 × 10−8. The colors indicate the LD (r2) between each lead SNP and neighboring SNPs based on the JPT population in the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.. Impact of identified variants on esophageal cancer risk and assessment of additive interaction of each SNP (1-allele change) with rs671 (GA versus GG).
ORs for esophageal cancer per 1-allele change in eight SNPs on three different subject groups [entire population (unstratified), subjects with the rs671 GG genotype only (GG), and subjects with the rs671 GA genotype only (GA)] were calculated by a random effects model by pooling study-specific ORs adjusted for sex, age, the first 10 principal components (for the BBJ Study), and study version (for the HERPACC Study). Stacked bar charts on assessment of additive interaction are presented as ORs partitioned into relative excess risks due to 1-allele change in each SNP other than rs671 (light gray), rs671 (GA versus GG) (gray), and their interaction (RERI) (purple). Statistical significance was set at the Bonferroni corrected threshold of P < 0.05/8 (=0.00625), and suggestive significance was set at P < 0.05. RERI was considered to achieve suggestive significance (P < 0.05) when its confidence interval did not include 0. Estimates in bold show statistical significance with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.00625). The HERPACC Study included 692 cases and 995 controls; the BBJ Study included 416 cases and 86,515 controls. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BBJ, BioBank Japan; HERPACC, Hospital-based Epidemiologic Research Program at Aichi Cancer Center.

References

    1. GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators , Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 392, 1015–1035 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood A. M., Kaptoge S., Butterworth A. S., Willeit P., Warnakula S., Bolton T., Paige E., Paul D. S., Sweeting M., Burgess S., Bell S., Astle W., Stevens D., Koulman A., Selmer R. M., Verschuren W. M. M., Sato S., Njølstad I., Woodward M., Salomaa V., Nordestgaard B. G., Yeap B. B., Fletcher A., Melander O., Kuller L. H., Balkau B., Marmot M., Koenig W., Casiglia E., Cooper C., Arndt V., Franco O. H., Wennberg P., Gallacher J., de la Cámara A. G., Völzke H., Dahm C. C., Dale C. E., Bergmann M. M., Crespo C. J., van der Schouw Y. T., Kaaks R., Simons L. A., Lagiou P., Schoufour J. D., Boer J. M. A., Key T. J., Rodriguez B., Moreno-Iribas C., Davidson K. W., Taylor J. O., Sacerdote C., Wallace R. B., Quiros J. R., Tumino R., Blazer D. G. II, Linneberg A., Daimon M., Panico S., Howard B., Skeie G., Strandberg T., Weiderpass E., Nietert P. J., Psaty B. M., Kromhout D., Salamanca-Fernandez E., Kiechl S., Krumholz H. M., Grioni S., Palli D., Huerta J. M., Price J., Sundström J., Arriola L., Arima H., Travis R. C., Panagiotakos D. B., Karakatsani A., Trichopoulou A., Kühn T., Grobbee D. E., Barrett-Connor E., van Schoor N., Boeing H., Overvad K., Kauhanen J., Wareham N., Langenberg C., Forouhi N., Wennberg M., Després J.-P., Cushman M., Cooper J. A., Rodriguez C. J., Sakurai M., Shaw J. E., Knuiman M., Voortman T., Meisinger C., Tjønneland A., Brenner H., Palmieri L., Dallongeville J., Brunner E. J., Assmann G., Trevisan M., Gillum R. F., Ford I., Sattar N., Lazo M., Thompson S. G., Ferrari P., Leon D. A., Smith G. D., Peto R., Jackson R., Banks E., Angelantonio E. D., Danesh J., Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration/EPIC-CVD/UK Biobank Alcohol Study Group , Risk thresholds for alcohol consumption: Combined analysis of individual-participant data for 599 912 current drinkers in 83 prospective studies. Lancet 391, 1513–1523 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaprio J., Koskenvuo M., Langinvainio H., Romanov K., Sarna S., Rose R. J., Genetic influences on use and abuse of alcohol: A study of 5638 adult Finnish twin brothers. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 11, 349–356 (1987). - PubMed
    1. Heath A. C., Meyer J., Jardine R., Martin N. G., The inheritance of alcohol consumption patterns in a general population twin sample: II. Determinants of consumption frequency and quantity consumed. J. Stud. Alcohol 52, 425–433 (1991). - PubMed
    1. Baik I., Cho N. H., Kim S. H., Han B. G., Shin C., Genome-wide association studies identify genetic loci related to alcohol consumption in Korean men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 93, 809–816 (2011). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts