Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):140.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10563-6.

Theories used to develop or evaluate social prescribing in studies: a scoping review

Sinah Evers  1   2 , Kerryn Husk  3 , Hendrik Napierala  4 , Lydia Wendt  5   6   7   8 , Ansgar Gerhardus  5   6
Affiliations

Theories used to develop or evaluate social prescribing in studies: a scoping review

Sinah Evers et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aims to provide an overview of how theories were used in the development or evaluation of social prescribing (SP) intervention studies.

Background: SP describes a patient pathway where general practitioners (GPs) connect patients with community activities through referrals to link workers. This review seeks to understand the explanations provided for the outcomes and implementation process of SP.

Inclusion criteria: Studies using a defined theory to develop or evaluate a specific SP intervention in primary care and the community sector.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology. The following databases were searched on 8th of July 2022: PubMed, ASSIA, Cochrane, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Social Care Online, Sociological Abstracts, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search only considered English language texts. Additional literature was identified by searching relevant web pages and by contacting experts. The selection of sources and the data extraction was done by two reviewers independently.

Results: The search resulted in 4240 reports, of which 18 were included in the scoping review. Of these, 16 were conducted in the UK, one in Canada and one in Australia. The majority of reports employed a qualitative approach (11/18). Three were study protocols. 11 distinct theories were applied to explain outcomes (4 theories), differences in outcomes (3 theories), and the implementation of the intervention (4 theories). In terms of practical application, the identified theories were predominantly used to explain and understand qualitative findings. Only one theory was used to define variables for hypothesis testing. All theories were used for the evaluation and none for the development of SP.

Conclusion: The theories influenced which outcomes the evaluation assessed, which causal pathway was expected to generate these outcomes, and which methodological approaches were used. All three groups of theories that were identified focus on relevant aspects of SP: fostering positive patient/community outcomes, addressing inequalities by considering the context of someone's individual circumstances, and successfully implementing SP by collaboratively working across professions and institutional boundaries. Additional insight is required regarding the optimal use of theories in practical applications.

Keywords: Community; Health care research; Primary care; Social prescribing; Social problems; Theories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The use of theories for social prescribing with examples
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Husk K, Blockley K, Lovell R, Bethel A, Lang I, Byng R, et al. What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(2):309–324. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12839. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Academy for Social Prescribing. What is social prescribing?. 2021. Available from: https://socialprescribingacademy.org.uk/about-us/what-is-social-prescrib.... [cited 2022 Mar 25].
    1. Morse DF, Sandhu S, Mulligan K, Tierney S, Polley M, Giurca BC, et al. Global developments in social prescribing. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(5):1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008524. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NHS. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019; Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term....

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources