Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):142.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10518-3.

An integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach to advancing community-based depression care in Vietnam: lessons from an ongoing research-policy collaboration

Jill K Murphy #  1 , Leena W Chau #  2 , Vu Cong Nguyen  3 , Harry Minas  4 , Duong Viet Anh  3 , John O'Neil  5
Affiliations

An integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach to advancing community-based depression care in Vietnam: lessons from an ongoing research-policy collaboration

Jill K Murphy et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based mental health policies are key to supporting the expansion of community-based mental health care and are increasingly being developed in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this, research on the process of mental health policy development in LMICs is limited. Engagement between researchers and policy makers via an integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approach can help to facilitate the process of evidence-based policy making. This paper provides a descriptive case study of a decade-long policy and research collaboration between partners in Vietnam, Canada and Australia to advance mental health policy for community-based depression care in Vietnam.

Methods: This descriptive case study draws on qualitative data including team meeting minutes, a focus group discussion with research team leaders, and key informant interviews with two Vietnamese policy makers. Our analysis draws on Murphy et al.'s (2021) findings and recommendations related to stakeholder engagement in global mental health research.

Results: Consistent with Murphy et al.'s findings, facilitating factors across three thematic categories were identified. Related to 'the importance of understanding context', engagement between researchers and policy partners from the formative research stage provided a foundation for engagement that aligned with local priorities. The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst to further advance the prioritization of mental heath by the Government of Vietnam. 'The nature of engagement' is also important, with findings demonstrating that long-term policy engagement was facilitated by continuous funding mechanisms that have enabled trust-building and allowed the research team to respond to local priorities over time. 'Communication and dissemination' are also crucial, with the research team supporting mental health awareness-raising among policy makers and the community, including via capacity building initiatives.

Conclusions: This case study identifies factors influencing policy engagement for mental health system strengthening in an LMIC setting. Sustained engagement with policy leaders helps to ensure alignment with local priorities, thus facilitating uptake and scale-up. Funding agencies can play a crucial role in supporting mental health system development through longer term funding mechanisms. Increased research related to the policy engagement process in global mental health will further support policy development and improvement in mental health care in LMICs.

Keywords: Case study; Collaboration; Global mental health; Integrated knowledge translation; Policy engagement; Stakeholder engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Key milestones, activities and studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2001: Mental health- new understanding, new hope; 2001.
    1. World Health Organization . Mhgap intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings: Mental health gap action programme (mhgap), version 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. - PubMed
    1. Taylor Salisbury T, Killaspy H, King M. An international comparison of the deinstitutionalisation of mental health care: development and findings of the mental health services deinstitutionalisation measure (mendit) BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0762-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thornicroft G, Deb T, Henderson C. Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(3):276–286. doi: 10.1002/wps.20349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, Chisholm D, Collins PY, Cooper JL, Eaton J, et al. The lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet. 2018;392(10157):1553–1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. - DOI - PubMed