Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;309(4):1585-1595.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07345-6. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

The role of cervical elastography in the differential diagnosis of preinvasive and invasive lesions of the cervix

Affiliations

The role of cervical elastography in the differential diagnosis of preinvasive and invasive lesions of the cervix

Ecem Yücel et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Study objective: This study aims to evaluate the role of cervical elastography in the differential diagnosis of preinvasive and invasive lesions of the cervix.

Materials and methods: A total of 95 women participated in this prospective study and were divided into the following groups: 19 healthy subjects (group 1) with normal cervicovaginal smear (CVS) and negative human papillomavirus test (HPV DNA), 19 women with normal cervical biopsy and normal final pathological result of cervical biopsy (group 2), 19 women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) (group 3), 19 women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (group 4), and 19 women with cervical cancer (group 5). Clinical, demographic, histopathological, and elastographic results were compared between these groups.

Results: Comparing groups, age (40.42 ± 8.31 vs. 39.53 ± 8.96 vs. 38.79 ± 9.53 vs. 40.74 ± 7.42 vs. 54.63 ± 12.93, p < 0.001 respectively), gravida (1.74 ± 1.33 vs. 2.16 ± 1.68 vs. 2.21 ± 1.96 vs. 2.53 ± 1.93 vs. 4.63 ± 2.17 p < 0.001 respectively), parity (1.37 ± 0.68 vs. 1.68 ± 1.20 vs. 1.58 ± 1.30 vs. 2.00 ± 1.67 vs. 3.37 ± 1.61, p < 0.001 respectively), and the proportion of patients at menopause (10.5% vs., 15.8% vs. 10.5% vs. 5.3% vs. 57.9%, p < 0.01 respectively), a statistically significant difference was found (Table 1). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the number of abortions, BMI, mode of delivery, smoking, additional disease status, history of surgery, and family history (p > 0.05) (Table 2. As a result of the applied roc analysis, mean cervical elastographic stiffness degree (ESD) was found to be an influential factor in predicting cervical cancer (p < 0.05). The mean cut-off value was 44.65%, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 96.1% (Table 7).

Conclusion: Measurement of ESD by elastography is a low-cost, easily applicable, and non-invasive indicator that can distinguish cervical cancer from normal cervical and preinvasive lesions. However, it is unsuitable for determining preinvasive cervical lesions from normal cervix.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Elastography; HSIL; LSIL; Transvaginal ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheung LC et al (2020) 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: methods for risk estimation, recommended management, and validation. J Low Genit Tract Dis 24(2):90 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Goodman A, Nour N (2014) Cervical cancer screening: the complex interplay of medical infrastructure, society, and culture. Oncologist 19:315–317 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice. World Health Organization 2006
    1. WHO guidance note: comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control: a healthier future for girls and women. WHO, 2013, p 2