Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 28;25(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00749-3.

Suprapatellar tibial fracture nailing is associated with lower rate for acute compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomy compared with the infrapatellar approach

Essi E Honkonen  1 , Jussi P Repo  2 , Heidi Lehtokangas  2 , Emma Luoma  3 , Mikko Uimonen  3 , Sami Nurmi  2 , Antti Ylitalo  2 , Antti Riuttanen  2 , Tiia Kivelä  2 , Ville M Mattila  2 , Piia Suomalainen  2
Affiliations

Suprapatellar tibial fracture nailing is associated with lower rate for acute compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomy compared with the infrapatellar approach

Essi E Honkonen et al. J Orthop Traumatol. .

Abstract

Background: Intramedullary tibial nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for stabilizing tibial shaft fractures. IMN can be performed through an infra- or suprapatellar approach.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the rate of fasciotomies for acute compartment syndrome between infra- and suprapatellar approaches.

Methods: A total of 614 consecutive patients who were treated with IMN for tibial fracture between October 2007 and February 2020 were included in the study. The approach used for IMN was determined by the operating surgeon. Infrapatellar IMN was performed with the knee in deep flexion position, with or without calcaneal traction. Suprapatellar IMN was performed in straight or semiflexed position. The diagnosis of compartment syndrome was based on clinical analysis, but for some patients, a continuous compartment pressure measurement was used. The primary outcome was the rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies.

Results: The study sample included 513 patients treated with infrapatellar IMN and 101 patients treated with suprapatellar IMN technique. The mean age of the patients was 44.7 years (infrapatellar technique) and 48.4 years (suprapatellar technique). High energy trauma was seen in 138 (27%) patients treated with infrapatellar technique and in 39 (39%) patients treated with suprapatellar technique. In the suprapatellar group (n = 101), there were no cases of peri- or postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies. In the infrapatellar group (n = 513), the need for fasciotomies was stated in 67 patients, 31 patients (6.0%) perioperatively and in 36 patients (7.0%) postoperatively. The rate of fasciotomies (0/101 versus 67/513 cases) differed significantly (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the fracture morphology or patient demographics between the study groups.

Conclusions: The suprapatellar technique is recommended over the infrapatellar approach in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomies was significantly lower with the suprapatellar technique. The major cause of increased rate of peri- or postoperative acute compartment syndrome with infrapatellar IMN technique is presumably associated with the positioning of the patient during the operation.

Keywords: Acute compartment syndrome; Fasciotomy; Infrapatellar approach; Intramedullary nail; Suprapatellar approach; Tibial saft fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow chart. IMN intramedullary nail, TEN titanium elastic nail, IP infrapatellar nail, SP suprapatellar nail
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Laurila J, Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Kääriäinen M, Mattila VM. Tibial shaft fractures in Finland between 1997 and 2014. Injury. 2019;50(4):973–977. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McQueen MM, Christie J, Court-Brown CM. Acute compartment syndrome in tibial diaphyseal fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1996;8:95–98. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.78B1.0780095. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McQueen MM, Gaston P, Court-Brown CM. Acute compartment syndrome. Who is at risk? J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2000;82(2):200–203. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.82B2.9799. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shadgan B, Menon M, Sanders D, Berry G, Martin C, Jr, Duffy P, et al. Current thinking about acute compartment syndrome of the lower extremity. Can J Surg. 2010;53(5):329–334. - PMC - PubMed