Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2301793.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2301793. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

The impact of risk perception and institutional trust on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China

Affiliations

The impact of risk perception and institutional trust on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China

Guiwu Chen et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Vaccination has become the primary means for citizens to prevent severe morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. However, vaccine hesitancy poses a major threat to global public health security. Based on the data from Chinese General Social Survey in 2021, this study aims to explore the socio-political aspects of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, focusing on the relationship between COVID-19 risk perceptions, institutional trust and vaccine hesitancy. Among the samples, 39.8% of the respondents exhibited COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, 48.9% had a high awareness of the risk of COVID-19, and 74.6% presented a high level of trust in institutions. The results showed that higher risk perception and institutional trust are negatively correlated with vaccine hesitancy (p < .001). Institutional trust had no statistically significant moderating effect on the association between risk perception and vaccine hesitancy, but the role of institutional trust in influencing vaccine hesitancy is more significant at a lower level of perceptions of COVID-19 risk. Furthermore, regional variations in the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy were demonstrated in China. These findings have important implications for developing strategies to address vaccine hesitancy.

Keywords: COVID-19; China; institutional trust; region; risk perception; vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportions of vaccine hesitancy, risk perception and institutional trust. VH: vaccine hesitancy; RP: risk perception; IT: institutional trust. Abscissa: Categories;Ordinate: proportion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lane S, MacDonald NE, Marti M, Dumolard L.. Vaccine hesitancy around the globe: analysis of three years of WHO/UNICEF joint reporting form data-2015-2017. Vaccine. 2018;36(26):3861–7. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.063. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Smith DM, Paterson P.. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine. 2014;32(19):2150–9. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Löffler P. Review: vaccine myth-buster - cleaning up with prejudices and dangerous misinformation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:663280. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.663280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar D, Chandra R, Mathur M, Samdariya S, Kapoor N. Vaccine hesitancy: understanding better to address better. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5(1):2. doi:10.1186/s13584-016-0062-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quinn SC, Jamison A, An J, Freimuth VS, Hancock GR, Musa D. Breaking down the monolith: understanding flu vaccine uptake among African Americans. SSM Popul Health. 2018;4:25–36. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.11.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances