Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 12:37:101633.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101633. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Systems biology approach to identify biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Systems biology approach to identify biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer

Niloufar Sadat Kalaki et al. Biochem Biophys Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC), is the third most prevalent cancer across the globe, and is often detected at advanced stage. Late diagnosis of CRC, leave the chemotherapy and radiotherapy as the main options for the possible treatment of the disease which are associated with severe side effects. In the present study, we seek to explore CRC gene expression data using a systems biology framework to identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for earlier diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Methods: The expression data was retrieved from the gene expression omnibus (GEO). Differential gene expression analysis was conducted using R/Bioconductor package. The PPI network was reconstructed by the STRING. Cystoscope and Gephi software packages were used for visualization and centrality analysis of the PPI network. Clustering analysis of the PPI network was carried out using k-mean algorithm. Gene-set enrichment based on Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway databases was carried out to identify the biological functions and pathways associated with gene groups. Prognostic value of the selected identified hub genes was examined by survival analysis, using GEPIA.

Results: A total of 848 differentially expressed genes were identified. Centrality analysis of the PPI network resulted in identification of 99 hubs genes. Clustering analysis dissected the PPI network into seven interactive modules. While several DEGs and the central genes in each module have already reported to contribute to CRC progression, survival analysis confirmed high expression of central genes, CCNA2, CD44, and ACAN contribute to poor prognosis of CRC patients. In addition, high expression of TUBA8, AMPD3, TRPC1, ARHGAP6, JPH3, DYRK1A and ACTA1 was found to associate with decreased survival rate.

Conclusion: Our results identified several genes with high centrality in PPI network that contribute to progression of CRC. The fact that several of the identified genes have already been reported to be relevant to diagnosis and treatment of CRC, other highlighted genes with limited literature information may hold potential to be explored in the context of CRC biomarker and drug target discovery.

Keywords: Biomarker; Colorectal cancer; Hub gene; PPI network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis. The size and the color of nodes represent the degree and betweenness, respectively. (a) PPI networks of the common differentially expressed genes from the GSE110224 (b) PPI network of Hub genes of the common differentially expressed genes from the GSE110224.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Network visualization and analysis of hub genes from the PPI network of hub genes by gephi. The size and the color of nodes represent the degree and betweenness, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
K‑means clustering of the PPI network are displayed. Proteins are represented by the nodes; edges represent the protein‑protein associations; The strength of the data is determined by the line thickness.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Overall survival verification of core genes. CCNA2, CD44 and ACAN showed a significant difference expression. (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Overall survival verification of core genes. A) TUBA8, B) AMPD3, C) TRPC1, D) ARHGAP6, E) JPH3, F) DYRK1A and G) ACTA1 showed a significant difference in overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. - PubMed
    1. Kijima S., Sasaki T., Nagata K., Utano K., Lefor A.T., Sugimoto H. Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. World J. Gastroenterol.: WJG. 2014;20(45) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner H., Jansen L., Ulrich A., Chang-Claude J., Hoffmeister M. Survival of patients with symptom-and screening-detected colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Favoriti P., Carbone G., Greco M., Pirozzi F., Pirozzi R.E.M., Corcione F. Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: a review. Updates Surg. 2016;68:7–11. - PubMed
    1. Xu H., Ma Y., Zhang J., Gu J., Jing X., Lu S., et al. Identification and verification of core genes in colorectal cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2020:2020. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources