Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 10;4(1):100296.
doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100296. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Asian-White disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Asian-White disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meejin Park et al. AJOG Glob Rep. .

Abstract

Objective: Obstetrical anal sphincter injury describes a severe injury to the perineum and perianal muscles after birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injury occurs in approximately 4.4% of vaginal births in the United States; however, racial and ethnic inequities in the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury have been shown in several high-income countries. Specifically, an increased risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in individuals who identify as Asian vs those who identify as White has been documented among residents of the United States, Australia, Canada, Western Europe, and the Scandinavian countries. The high rates of obstetrical anal sphincter injury among the Asian diaspora in these countries are higher than obstetrical anal sphincter injury rates reported among Asian populations residing in Asia. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in high-income, non-Asian countries was conducted to further evaluate this relationship.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, EmCare, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to March 2023 for original research studies.

Study eligibility criteria: Observational studies using keywords and controlled vocabulary terms related to race, ethnicity and obstetrical anal sphincter injury. All observational studies, including cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort were included. 2 reviewers followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology recommendations.

Methods: Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) for dichotomous data using the random effects model and the odds ratios as effect measures with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analysis was performed among Asian subgroups. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. Meta-regression was used to determine sources of between-study heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 27 studies conducted in 7 countries met the inclusion criteria encompassing 2,337,803 individuals. The pooled incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury was higher among Asian individuals than White individuals (pooled odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-1.80). Subgroup analyses showed that obstetrical anal sphincter injury rates were highest among South Asians and among population-based vs hospital-based studies. Meta-regression showed that moderate heterogeneity remained even after accounting for differences in studies by types of Asian subgroups included, study year, mode of delivery included, and study setting.

Conclusion: Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is more frequent among Asian versus white birthing individuals in multiple high-income, non-Asian countries. Qualitative and quantitative research to elucidate underlying causal mechanisms responsible for this relationship are warranted.

Keywords: Asian race; Asian-White disparities; ethnic disparities; fourth-degree perineal lacerations; obstetrical anal sphincter injury; obstetrical trauma; racial disparities; severe perineal lacerations; third-degree perineal lacerations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of studies included in the systematic review OASI, obstetrical anal sphincter injury.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Obstetrical anal sphincter injury among Asian vs White individuals (dichotomous data) Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects dichotomous method. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Obstetrical anal sphincter injury among Asian vs White individuals (adjusted data) Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects inverse variance method. CI, confidence interval;
Figure 4
Figure 4
Meta-regression assessment of heterogeneity Linear meta-regression between log odds and proportion of Asian individuals in each source population was performed (intercept: 0.774; slope: −0.017; P=.002).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Admon LK, Winkelman TNA, Zivin K, Terplan M, Mhyre JM, Dalton VK. Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012-2015. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:1158–1166. - PubMed
    1. Holdt Somer SJ, Sinkey RG, Bryant AS. Epidemiology of racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41:258–265. - PubMed
    1. Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:225–230. - PubMed
    1. Wegnelius G, Hammarström M. Complete rupture of anal sphincter in primiparas: long-term effects and subsequent delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:258–263. - PubMed
    1. Nilsson IEK, Åkervall S, Molin M, Milsom I, Gyhagen M. Symptoms of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one, or two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224:276. e1–e23. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources