Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;20(4):240-250.
doi: 10.5114/kitp.2023.134177. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate blood levels of interleukin-6 in lung cancer patients

Affiliations

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate blood levels of interleukin-6 in lung cancer patients

Seyed Vahid Jasemi et al. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: The exact mechanism responsible for inflammation in malignancy is not completely understood, but it is possible that interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a major role in triggering and maintaining an inflammatory response.

Aim: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the levels of IL-6 in the serum/plasma of lung cancer (LC) patients.

Material and methods: The researchers searched four databases up to September 11, 2022, to find studies that reported on IL-6 levels in LC patients compared to healthy controls (HCs). They calculated effect sizes using standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). To evaluate the quality of each study, they used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). They performed subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, heterogeneity analyses, trial sequential analysis, and publication bias with the trim-and-fill method.

Results: The meta-analysis included 28 studies, and the results showed that the pooled SMD was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.19; p < 0.00001; I2 = 98%), indicating that LC patients had significantly higher levels of IL-6 in their serum/plasma than HCs.

Conclusions: The study found that the publication year and quality score of the studies were positively associated with the level of IL-6, while the sample size was inversely related. The research suggests that measuring IL-6 levels in the blood could be useful for detecting and monitoring LC as it appears to be a reliable biomarker.

Keywords: interleukin-6; lung neoplasm; meta-analysis; plasma; serum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection interleukin-6 *15 studies reported polymorphisms of IL-6. 1 study reported IL-6 mRNA level. 44 studies didn’t include control group or participants were under treatment. 1 study included individuals with several cancers as case group. 1 study measured sputum IL-6. 1 study reported the levels of IL-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. 1 study reported the levels of IL-6 in breath condensate. 5 studies didn’t include required data for case and/or control groups. 1 study had duplicate data. 2 studies had no full text. 1 study reported fluorescence intensity of IL-6. 1 study reported production of IL-6 by peripheral blood monocytes. 1 study reported geometric means of IL-6. 1 study had irrelevant data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Random-effects forest plot analysis. Comparison of blood interleukin-6 levels in lung cancer patients compared to healthy controls
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trial sequential analysis. Comparison of blood interleukin-6 levels in lung cancer patients compared to healthy controls. (heterogeneity or D2 = 100%)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heterogeneity plots. A – Radial plot. B – L’Abbe plot. Numbers show studies
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sensitivity analyses: A – one-study-removed analysis. B – cumulative analysis
Figure 6
Figure 6
Funnel plot and trim-and-fill method. The open dots show the observed studies, and the closed dots show the missing studies imputed by the trim-and-fill method. The dashed lines that create a triangular area indicate the 95% confidence intervals, and the vertical solid line illustrates the overall effect size

Similar articles

References

    1. Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdel-Rahman O, et al. . Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5: 1749-1768. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424. - PubMed
    1. Barta JA, Powell CA, Wisnivesky JP. Global epidemiology of lung cancer. Ann Global Health 2019; 85: 8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Fedewa SA, Butterly LF, Anderson JC, et al. . Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 145-164. - PubMed
    1. Kanwal M, Ding X, Cao Y. Familial risk for lung cancer. Oncol Lett 2017; 13: 535-42. - PMC - PubMed