Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;33(1):e15002.
doi: 10.1111/exd.15002.

Redefine photoprotection: Sun protection beyond sunburn

Affiliations

Redefine photoprotection: Sun protection beyond sunburn

Mirja van Bodegraven et al. Exp Dermatol. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light leads to acute and chronic UV damage and is the main risk factor for the development of skin cancer. In most countries with western lifestyle, the topical application of sunscreens on UV-exposed skin areas is by far the most frequently used preventive measure against sunburn. Further than preventing sunburns, increasing numbers of consumers are appreciating sunscreens with a medium- to high-level sun protective factor (SPF) as basis for sustainable-skin ageing or skin cancer prevention programs. However, recent investigations indicate that clinically significant DNA damages as well as a lasting impairment of cutaneous immunosurveillance already occur far below the standard of one minimal erythema dose (MED) sunburn level, which contributes to the current discussion of the clinical value of high-protective SPF values. Ex vivo investigations on human skin showed that the application of SPF30 reduces DNA damage for a day long sun exposure (24 MED) drastically by about 53% but is significantly surpassed by SPF100 reducing DNA damage by approx. 73%. Further analysis on different SPF protection levels in UV-exposed cell culture assays focusing on IL-18, cell vitality and cis/trans-urocanic acid support these findings. Whereas SPF30 and SPF50+ sunscreens already offer a solid UVB cover for most indications, our results indicate that SPF100 provides significant additional protection against mutagenic (non-apoptotic-) DNA damage and functional impairment of the cutaneous immunosurveillance and therefore qualifies as an optimized sunscreen for specifically vulnerable patient groups such as immunosuppressed patients, or skin cancer patients.

Keywords: DNA damage; cell vitality; minimal erythema dose; sun protection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bolanca Z, Bolanca I, Buljan M, Blajic I, Penavic Zeljko J, Situm M. Trends, habits and attitudes towards suntanning. Coll Antropol. 2008;32(Suppl 2):143-146.
    1. Urbach F. The historical aspects of sunscreens. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001;64:99-104.
    1. Svarc F. A brief illustrated history on sunscreens and sun protection. Pure Appl Chem. 2015;87:929-936.
    1. Aldahan AS, Shah VV, Mlacker S, Nouri K. The history of sunscreen. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1316.
    1. Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;354:723-729.

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources