Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?
- PMID: 38285163
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00803-w
Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?
Abstract
Purpose: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented.
Methods: 29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2 years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°.
Results: Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF.
Conclusion: Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Double curve; Posterior spinal fusion; Vertebral body tethering.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Similar articles
-
Compensatory thoracic curve correction in lumbar anterior vertebral body tether (VBT) versus lumbar posterior spinal fusion (PSF).Spine Deform. 2025 Mar;13(2):581-586. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00994-w. Epub 2024 Nov 8. Spine Deform. 2025. PMID: 39516443
-
Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case-control study.Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00519-3. Epub 2022 May 24. Spine Deform. 2022. PMID: 35610543
-
The effectiveness of selective thoracic fusion for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):4-16. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2338. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26657460
-
Surgical Treatment of Scoliosis Lenke Type 5, Anterior Versus Posterior, Which Approach is Better?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Jul 15;48(14):E223-E234. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004529. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023. PMID: 36730847
-
To tether or fuse? Significant equipoise remains in treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis.Spine Deform. 2022 Jul;10(4):763-773. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00497-6. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Spine Deform. 2022. PMID: 35316524 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative meta-analysis of vertebral body tethering and posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Evaluation of radiographic, perioperative, clinical, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates.Spine Deform. 2025 Jun 8. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01113-z. Online ahead of print. Spine Deform. 2025. PMID: 40484922 Review.
References
-
- Cheng JC, Castelein RM, Chu WC, Danielsson AJ, Dobbs MB, Grivas TB, Gurnett CA, Luk KD, Moreau A, Newton PO, Stokes IA, Weinstein SL, Burwell RG (2015) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.30 - DOI
-
- McDonald TC, Shah SA, Hargiss JB, Varghese J, Boeyer ME, Pompliano M, Neal K, Lonner BS, Larson AN, Yaszay B, Newton PO, Hoernschemeyer DG (2022) When successful, anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) induces differential segmental growth of vertebrae: an in vivo study of 51 patients and 764 vertebrae. Spine Deform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00471-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Auerbach JD, Lonner BS, Errico TJ, Freeman A, Goerke D, Beaubien BP (2012) Quantification of intradiscal pressures below thoracolumbar spinal fusion constructs: is there evidence to support “saving a level?” Spine 37:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821e1106 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lonner BS, Ren Y, Upasani VV, Marks MM, Newton PO, Samdani AF, Chen K, Shufflebarger HL, Shah SA, Lefton DR, Nasser H, Dabrowski CT, Betz RR (2018) Disc degeneration in unfused caudal motion segments ten years following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 6:684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ohashi M, Bastrom TP, Marks MC, Bartley CE, Newton PO (2020) The benefits of sparing lumbar motion segments in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are evident at 10 years postoperatively. Spine 45:755–763. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003373 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical