Vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review
- PMID: 38285164
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00806-7
Vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) remains the most common type of pediatric scoliosis, mostly affecting children between ages 10 and 18. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) offers a non-fusion alternative to the gold standard spinal fusion that permits flexibility and some growth within instrumented segments. This article will serve as a comprehensive literature review of the current state-of-the-art of VBT in relation to radiographic and clinical outcomes, complications, and the learning curve associated with the procedure.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from April 2002 to December 2022. Studies were included if they discussed VBT and consisted of clinical studies in which a minimum 2-years follow-up was reported, and series that included anesthetic considerations, learning curve, and early operative morbidity.
Results: Forty-nine studies spanning the period from April 2002 to December 2022 were reviewed.
Conclusion: This article illustrates the potential benefits and challenges of the surgical treatment of AIS with VBT and can serve as a basis for the further study and refinement of this technique ideally as a living document that will be updated regularly.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Literature review; Vertebral body tethering.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Similar articles
-
Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine Deform. 2023 Nov;11(6):1297-1307. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9. Epub 2023 Jul 11. Spine Deform. 2023. PMID: 37432604 Free PMC article.
-
Radiological Outcomes of Re-tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 2-to-5-year Follow-Up Case Series After Index Vertebral Body Tethering Failure.Eur Spine J. 2024 Jul;33(7):2734-2741. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08363-x. Epub 2024 Jun 18. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38888800
-
Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case-control study.Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00519-3. Epub 2022 May 24. Spine Deform. 2022. PMID: 35610543
-
Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?Spine Deform. 2024 May;12(3):651-662. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00803-w. Epub 2024 Jan 29. Spine Deform. 2024. PMID: 38285163
-
To tether or fuse? Significant equipoise remains in treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis.Spine Deform. 2022 Jul;10(4):763-773. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00497-6. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Spine Deform. 2022. PMID: 35316524 Review.
Cited by
-
Anterior Spinal Fusion for Thoraco-Lumbar Idiopathic Scoliosis Comparing Less Invasive Concave versus Traditional Convex Approach: A Pilot Study.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 26;13(15):4383. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154383. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124650 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive and Historical Review of Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of Research Trends and Hotspots.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 11;14(16):5676. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165676. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40869504 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reducing postoperative morbidity by diminishing chest tube drainage utilizing tranexamic acid following vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine Deform. 2025 May;13(3):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01042-x. Epub 2025 Jan 26. Spine Deform. 2025. PMID: 39864033
-
Current Status of Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Umbrella Review.Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Dec 10;16:305-315. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S502053. eCollection 2024. Orthop Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39679276 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correlation between abnormal posture, screen time, physical activity, and suspected scoliosis: a cross-sectional study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 13;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05760-w. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40223116 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kepler CK, Meredith DS, Green DW, Widmann RF (2012) Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 24(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834ec982 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Green DW, Lawhorne TW 3rd, Widmann RF et al (2011) Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(23):1948–1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff1ea9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fabricant PD, Admoni S, Green DW, Ipp LS, Widmann RF (2012) Return to athletic activity after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: analysis of independent predictors. J Pediatr Orthop 32(3):259–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b285f - DOI - PubMed
-
- Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL (2006) Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):275–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197652.52890.71 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous