Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 9:10:e55368.
doi: 10.2196/55368.

Proposing a Principle-Based Approach for Teaching AI Ethics in Medical Education

Affiliations

Proposing a Principle-Based Approach for Teaching AI Ethics in Medical Education

Lukas Weidener et al. JMIR Med Educ. .

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, potentially leading to substantial advancements such as improved diagnostics, has been of increasing scientific and societal interest in recent years. However, the use of AI raises new ethical challenges, such as an increased risk of bias and potential discrimination against patients, as well as misdiagnoses potentially leading to over- or underdiagnosis with substantial consequences for patients. Recognizing these challenges, current research underscores the importance of integrating AI ethics into medical education. This viewpoint paper aims to introduce a comprehensive set of ethical principles for teaching AI ethics in medical education. This dynamic and principle-based approach is designed to be adaptive and comprehensive, addressing not only the current but also emerging ethical challenges associated with the use of AI in medicine. This study conducts a theoretical analysis of the current academic discourse on AI ethics in medical education, identifying potential gaps and limitations. The inherent interconnectivity and interdisciplinary nature of these anticipated challenges are illustrated through a focused discussion on "informed consent" in the context of AI in medicine and medical education. This paper proposes a principle-based approach to AI ethics education, building on the 4 principles of medical ethics-autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice-and extending them by integrating 3 public health ethics principles-efficiency, common good orientation, and proportionality. The principle-based approach to teaching AI ethics in medical education proposed in this study offers a foundational framework for addressing the anticipated ethical challenges of using AI in medicine, recommended in the current academic discourse. By incorporating the 3 principles of public health ethics, this principle-based approach ensures that medical ethics education remains relevant and responsive to the dynamic landscape of AI integration in medicine. As the advancement of AI technologies in medicine is expected to increase, medical ethics education must adapt and evolve accordingly. The proposed principle-based approach for teaching AI ethics in medical education provides an important foundation to ensure that future medical professionals are not only aware of the ethical dimensions of AI in medicine but also equipped to make informed ethical decisions in their practice. Future research is required to develop problem-based and competency-oriented learning objectives and educational content for the proposed principle-based approach to teaching AI ethics in medical education.

Keywords: AI; AI ethics; artificial intelligence; artificial intelligence ethics; ethics; medical AI ethics; medical artificial intelligence ethics; medical education; medical ethics; medicine; public health ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The principles of medical artificial intelligence (AI) ethics for medical education.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamet P, Tremblay J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism. 2017 Apr;69S:S36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.011.S0026-0495(17)30015-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amisha. Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jul;8(7):2328–31. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_440_19. http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue... JFMPC-8-2328 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, Wang Y, Dong Q, Shen H, Wang Y. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Dec;2(4):230–43. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101. https://svn.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=29507784 svn-2017-000101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hedlund M, Persson E. Expert responsibility in AI development. AI Soc. 2022 Jun 13;:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01498-9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-022-01498-9 - DOI - DOI
    1. Ryan M, Stahl BC. Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc. 2020 Jun 09;19(1):61–86. doi: 10.1108/jices-12-2019-0138. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138/f... - DOI - DOI