Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 29:384:e076410.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076410.

Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Haiqiang Yao et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase from database inception to 19 August 2023.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Eligible randomised controlled trials enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes who received GLP-1RA treatments and compared effects with placebo or any GLP-1RA drug, with a follow-up duration of at least 12 weeks. Trials with a crossover design, non-inferiority studies comparing GLP-1RA and other drug classes without a placebo group, using withdrawn drugs, and non-English studies were deemed ineligible.

Results: 76 eligible trials involving 15 GLP-1RA drugs and 39 246 participants were included in this network meta-analysis; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with placebo. All 15 GLP-1RAs effectively lowered haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. Tirzepatide induced the largest reduction of haemoglobin A1c concentrations (mean difference -2.10% (95% confidence interval -2.47% to -1.74%), surface under the cumulative ranking curve 94.2%; high confidence of evidence), and fasting plasma glucose concentrations (-3.12 mmol/L (-3.59 to -2.66), 97.2%; high confidence), and proved the most effective GLP-1RA drug for glycaemic control. Furthermore, GLP-1RAs were shown to have strong benefits to weight management for patients with type 2 diabetes. CagriSema (semaglutide with cagrilintide) resulted in the highest weight loss (mean difference -14.03 kg (95% confidence interval -17.05 to -11.00); high confidence of evidence), followed by tirzepatide (-8.47 kg (-9.68 to -7.26); high confidence). Semaglutide was effective in lowering the concentration of low density lipoprotein (-0.16 mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.02)) and total cholesterol (-0.48 mmol/L (-0.84 to -0.11)). Moreover, this study also raises awareness of gastrointestinal adverse events induced by GLP-1RAs, and concerns about safety are especially warranted for high dose administration.

Conclusions: GLP-1RAs are efficacious in treating adults with type 2 diabetes. Compared with the placebo, tirzepatide was the most effective GLP-1RA drug for glycaemic control by reducing haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. GLP-1RAs also significantly improved weight management for type 2 diabetes, with CagriSema performing the best for weight loss. The results prompt safety concerns for GLP-1RAs, especially with high dose administration, regarding gastrointestinal adverse events.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022342845.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine High-level Talent Start-up Research Project; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow diagram of preferred reporting items identified, included, and excluded for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Network of available comparisons of GLP-1RAs and placebo for HbA1c. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of trial participants, and the thickness of the line connecting the nodes is proportional to the randomised number of trial participants directly comparing the two treatments. Numbers represent the number of trials contributing to each treatment comparison. GLP-1RA=glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; PEG-loxenatide=polyethylene glycol loxenatide; ITCA 650=a combination of drug and device containing exenatide in osmotic mini pump
Fig 3
Fig 3
Forest plot of network effect sizes between GLP-1RAs and placebo for HbA1c measured in percentage. According to the network confidence meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework, the certainty of evidence is visually represented in the forest map, with varying colours indicating different confidence levels. The complete CINeMA assessments are shown in appendix 9. GLP-1RA=glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; PEG-loxenatide=polyethylene glycol loxenatide; ITCA 650=a combination of drug and device containing exenatide in osmotic mini pump
Fig 4
Fig 4
Network of available comparisons between GLP-1RAs and placebo for fasting blood glucose. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of trial participants, and the thickness of the line connecting the nodes is proportional to the randomised number of trial participants directly comparing the two treatments. Numbers represent the number of trials contributing to each treatment comparison. GLP-1RA=glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; PEG-loxenatide=polyethylene glycol loxenatide
Fig 5
Fig 5
Forest plot of network effect sizes between GLP-1RAs and placebo for fasting blood glucose. Certainty of evidence is visually represented in the forest map, with varying colours indicating different confidence levels. The complete CINeMA assessments are shown in appendix 9. GLP-1RA=glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; PEG-loxenatide=polyethylene glycol loxenatide
Fig 6
Fig 6
Network of available comparisons between GLP-1RAs and placebo for weight loss. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of trial participants, and the thickness of the line connecting the nodes is proportional to the randomised number of trial participants directly comparing the two treatments. Numbers represent the number of trials contributing to each treatment comparison. GLP-1RA=glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; PEG-loxenatide=polyethylene glycol loxenatide; ITCA 650=a combination of drug and device containing exenatide in osmotic mini pump
Fig 7
Fig 7
Forest plot of network effect sizes between GLP-1RAs and placebo for weight loss. Certainty of evidence is visually represented in the forest map, with varying colours indicating different confidence levels. The complete CINeMA assessments are shown in appendix 9. GLP-1RA=glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; PEG-loxenatide=polyethylene glycol loxenatide; ITCA 650=a combination of drug and device containing exenatide in osmotic mini pump
Fig 8
Fig 8
Estimates in network meta-analysis for common adverse events of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist compared with placebo. (A) discontinuation; (B) diarrhoea; (C) nausea; (D) vomiting. Effect sizes are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). PEG=polyethylene glycol
None

Comment in

References

    1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1789-858. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmadian M, Suh JM, Hah N, et al. PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future. Nat Med 2013;19:557-66. 10.1038/nm.3159. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apovian CM, Okemah J, O’Neil PM. Body weight considerations in the management of type 2 diabetes. Adv Ther 2019;36:44-58. 10.1007/s12325-018-0824-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma D, Verma S, Vaidya S, Kalia K, Tiwari V. Recent updates on GLP-1 agonists: Current advancements & challenges. Biomed Pharmacother 2018;108:952-62. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shi Q, Nong K, Vandvik PO, et al. Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2023;381:e074068. 10.1136/bmj-2022-074068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types