Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;38(4):712-719.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02153-6. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

Increase in peg-asparaginase clearance as a predictor for inactivation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations

Increase in peg-asparaginase clearance as a predictor for inactivation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Merete Dam et al. Leukemia. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Asparaginase is an essential component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy, yet its associated toxicities often lead to treatment discontinuation, increasing the risk of relapse. Hypersensitivity reactions include clinical allergies, silent inactivation, or allergy-like responses. We hypothesized that even moderate increases in asparaginase clearance are related to later inactivation. We therefore explored mandatory monitoring of asparaginase enzyme activity (AEA) in patients with ALL aged 1-45 years treated according to the ALLTogether pilot protocol in the Nordic and Baltic countries to relate mean AEA to inactivation, to build a pharmacokinetic model to better characterize the pharmacokinetics of peg-asparaginase and assess whether an increased clearance relates to subsequent inactivation. The study analyzed 1631 real-time AEA samples from 253 patients, identifying inactivation in 18.2% of the patients. This inactivation presented as mild allergy (28.3%), severe allergy (50.0%), or silent inactivation (21.7%). A pharmacokinetic transit compartment model was used to describe AEA-time profiles, revealing that 93% of patients with inactivation exhibited prior increased clearance, whereas 86% of patients without hypersensitivity maintained stable clearance throughout asparaginase treatment. These findings enable prediction of inactivation and options for either dose increments or a shift to alternative asparaginase formulations to optimize ALL treatment strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jazz Pharmaceuticals has BKA serving on its advisory board and MD served as a consultant for Servier on a single occasion. All other authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flowchart illustrating inclusion and exclusion.
Ph+ = Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. * Patients with one sample or only samples outside the defined timeslot 14 +/− 2 days from previous dose. One patient had plasmapheresis and samples were not reliable.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. AEA measurements and 95% CI over time in the groups; IM administration, IV administration,
AEA measurements day 1,4,7 and 11 after first dose and AEA Ctrough after every dose of peg-asparaginase. Patients with inactivation are illustrated as the blue line (including one patient with IM administered PEG-asparaginase and three patients ≥16 years) and patients in the non-inactivation group as the red, black and green line according to route of administration and age group.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. AEA measurements and 95% CI over time in the groups; Allergic reaction on 3rd dose, 4th dose, and 5th dose compared to no inactivation.
AEA measurements day 1,4,7 and 11 after first dose and AEA Ctrough after every dose of peg-asparaginase for patients <16 years (IV administration). Patients without inactivation are shown in red, those experiencing allergic reactions on the 3rd dose in blue, on the 4th dose in green, and on the 5th dose in black.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Risk of inactivation of peg-asparaginase.
Logistic regression model with AEA seven days after first dose.

References

    1. Silverman LB, Gelber RD, Dalton VK, Asselin BL, Barr RD, Clavell LA, et al. Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Dana-Farber Consortium Protocol 91-01. Blood. 2001;97:1211–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.5.1211. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brigitha LJ, Pieters R, van der Sluis IM. How much asparaginase is needed for optimal outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? A systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2021;157:238–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Sluis IM, Vrooman LM, Pieters R, Baruchel A, Escherich G, Goulden N, et al. Consensus expert recommendations for identification and management of asparaginase hypersensitivity and silent inactivation. Haematologica. 2016;101:279–85. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.137380. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brigitha LJ, Fiocco M, Pieters R, Albertsen BK, Escherich G, Lopez-Lopez E, et al. Hypersensitivity to Pegylated E.coli asparaginase as first-line treatment in contemporary paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia protocols: a meta-analysis of the Ponte di Legno Toxicity working group. Eur J Cancer. 2022;162:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henriksen LT, Harila-Saari A, Ruud E, Abrahamsson J, Pruunsild K, Vaitkeviciene G, et al. PEG-asparaginase allergy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the NOPHO ALL2008 protocol. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:427–33. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25319. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms