Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 29;25(1):94.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z.

Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage

Affiliations

Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage

Alice-Maria Toader et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Healthcare system data (HSD) are increasingly used in clinical trials, augmenting or replacing traditional methods of collecting outcome data. This study, PRIMORANT, set out to identify, in the UK context, issues to be considered before the decision to use HSD for outcome data in a clinical trial is finalised, a methodological question prioritised by the clinical trials community.

Methods: The PRIMORANT study had three phases. First, an initial workshop was held to scope the issues faced by trialists when considering whether to use HSDs for trial outcomes. Second, a consultation exercise was undertaken with clinical trials unit (CTU) staff, trialists, methodologists, clinicians, funding panels and data providers. Third, a final discussion workshop was held, at which the results of the consultation were fed back, case studies presented, and issues considered in small breakout groups.

Results: Key topics included in the consultation process were the validity of outcome data, timeliness of data capture, internal pilots, data-sharing, practical issues, and decision-making. A majority of consultation respondents (n = 78, 95%) considered the development of guidance for trialists to be feasible. Guidance was developed following the discussion workshop, for the five broad areas of terminology, feasibility, internal pilots, onward data sharing, and data archiving.

Conclusions: We provide guidance to inform decisions about whether or not to use HSDs for outcomes, and if so, to assist trialists in working with registries and other HSD providers to improve the design and delivery of trials.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Data validity; Healthcare systems data; Outcomes; Registries; Routinely collected data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GD reports speaker honoraria from Chiesi Ltd and Vertex Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work.

PR reports consultancy fees from Vyaire Medical and Sanofi outside the submitted work.

EJH reports honoraria and travel support from Kyowa Kirin; Abbvie; Ever; Bial, The Neurology Academy and CME Institute outside the submitted work.

JKQ has received grants from MRC, HDR UK, GSK, BI, asthma + lung UK, and AZ and personal fees for advisory board participation, consultancy or speaking fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Evidera, Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Insmed.

MKC was a member of the CONSORT-ROUTINE group. The Health Services Research Unit, where MKC works, receives core funding from the Scottish Government Health Directorates.

SBL reports no conflicts of interest.

MRSy reports speaker fees at clinical trial statistics training meeting for clinicians (no discussion of particular drugs) from Lilly Oncology; Speaker fees at clinical trial statistics training meeting for clinicians (no discussion of particular drugs) from Janssen; and Educational video on clinical trial statistics (no discussion of particular drugs) from Eisai.

MClout reports no conflicts of interest.

MC reports no conflicts of interest.

JThorn reports no conflicts of interest.

MR reports no conflicts of interest.

JH reports no conflicts of interest.

TJD reports no conflicts of interest.

AJF reports no conflicts of interest.

None of the other authors reported any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram

References

    1. Sydes MR, Barbachano Y, Bowman L, Denwood T, Farmer A, Garfield-Birkbeck S, et al. Realising the full potential of data-enabled trials in the UK: a call for action. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e043906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043906. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lensen S, Macnair A, Love SB, Yorke-Edwards V, Noor NM, Martyn M, et al. Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials–review of successful data requests to UK registries. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04329-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKay AJ, Jones AP, Gamble CL, Farmer AJ, Williamson PR. Use of routinely collected data in a UK cohort of publicly funded randomised clinical trials. F1000Research. 2021;9:323. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23316.3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alice-Maria Toader, Carrol Gamble, Susanna Dodd, et al. The use of healthcare systems data for RCTs, 17 October 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [10.21203/rs.3.rs-3373403/v1]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams AD, Davies G, Farrin AJ, Mafham M, Robling M, Sydes MR, et al. A DELPHI study priority setting the remaining challenges for the use of routinely collected data in trials: COMORANT-UK. Trials. 2023;24(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07251-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed