Patients Have a 15% Redislocation Rate After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With a Knotless Technique
- PMID: 38288032
- PMCID: PMC10823114
- DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100864
Patients Have a 15% Redislocation Rate After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With a Knotless Technique
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the redislocation rate after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) with a standardized knotless anchor technique in a consecutive series of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability.
Methods: Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent ABR by a single surgeon between January 2008 and December 2018 with a minimum follow up of 2 years. We collected data through phone interviews, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and review of patient records. The primary outcome was redislocation and secondary outcomes were recurrent subluxations, reoperation, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes. We also performed survival analysis and risk factor analysis.
Results: Of 88 patients (91 shoulders) who underwent ABR during the inclusion period, 70 patients (73 shoulders) were included (follow-up rate 80%). The mean follow-up was 7.5 years (range 2-12 years). Redislocation occurred in 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8%-25.4%) of patients at a mean of 41 months after surgery (range 6-115 months). The reoperation rate for recurrent redislocation was 4.1%. Overall, 90.4% reported being currently satisfied with their shoulder and the mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score at follow-up was 73.8% (range 8.3%-99.9%). Patients with redislocation were younger at primary operation than patients with no redislocation (mean 21 years vs 28 years; P = .023) and adjusted hazard ratio for age was 0.86 (95% CI 0.74-0.99; P = .033). It was more common to have less than 3 anchors in patients with redislocation (P = .024), but adjusted hazard ratio was 4.42 (95% CI 0.93-21.02; P = .061).
Conclusions: The redislocation rate after ABR with a standardized knotless anchor technique in a consecutive series of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability was found to be 15% after a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 7.5).
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case-series.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors (E.A., M.C.R.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Figures
References
-
- Haskoor J., Wang K.Y., Best M.J., et al. Trends in utilization and patient demographics for shoulder instability procedures from 2010 to 2019. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31:S13–S17. - PubMed
-
- Provencher M.T. Editorial Commentary: Is it time to take a stand? When arthroscopic Bankart repair is no longer a viable option for anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:2537–2540. - PubMed
-
- Kim S.J., Jung M., Moon H.K., Chang W.H., Kim S.G., Chun Y.M. Is the transglenoid suture technique recommendable for recurrent shoulder dislocation? A minimum 5-year follow-up in 59 non-athletic shoulders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1458–1462. - PubMed
-
- van der Linde J.A., van Kampen D.A., Terwee C.B., Dijksman L.M., Kleinjan G., Willems W.J. Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:2396–2403. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
