Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 12;6(1):100861.
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100861. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Absolute and Normalized Normative Torque Values of Knee Extensors and Flexors in Healthy Trained Subjects: Asymmetry Questions the Classical Use of Uninjured Limb as Reference

Affiliations

Absolute and Normalized Normative Torque Values of Knee Extensors and Flexors in Healthy Trained Subjects: Asymmetry Questions the Classical Use of Uninjured Limb as Reference

Simon Barrué-Belou et al. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Purpose: To provide normative values of maximal isometric torque of knee extensors and flexors measured at 80° of knee flexion and to characterize the results in healthy subjects practicing activities at risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Methods: Seventy-four trained volunteers (35 male and 39 female) aged 18 to 41 years were recruited. They alternately performed 3 maximal voluntary isometric contractions of knee extension and flexion. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction net torque was computed as the mean value of the peak torques recorded over the 3 trials.

Results: For women, the absolute torque for extensors was 143.5 ± 34.4 N⋅m (range, 87.7-253.1 N⋅m) and 66.8 ± 13.8 N⋅m (range, 37.5-93.1) for flexors. For men, the absolute torque for extensors was 199.8 ± 47.3 N⋅m (range, 99.3-311.5 N⋅m) and 89.8 ± 21.0 N⋅m (range, 51.8-137.2 N⋅m) for flexors. For women, the body mass normalized torque for extensors was 2.20 ± 0.51 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 1.22-3.74 N⋅m.kg-1) and 1.04 ± 0.26 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 0.41-1.50 N⋅m.kg-1) for flexors. For men, the normalized torque for extensors was 2.74 ± 0.58 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 1.51-4.08 N⋅m.kg-1) and 1.24 ± 0.30 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 0.64-2.05 N⋅m.kg-1) for flexors.

Conclusions: This study provides absolute and normalized normative values of maximal isometric torque measured at 80° of knee flexion for extensors and flexors in a series of healthy trained subjects practicing activities at risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. The considerable level of interlimb asymmetry and the weak association between dominance and strength observed in uninjured subjects call into question the classical use of contralateral side as reference for injured patients.

Clinical relevance: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are the most represented subjects using isokinetic dynamometers in many sport medicine and rehabilitation departments. Clinicians need reference values to compare patients with ACL injuries with comparable healthy subjects. This study may provide this information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: This study was funded by French-speaking Arthroscopy Society (SFA) and Physioswiss. All authors (S.B.B., M.-A.D., A.W., A.D., F.F., H.B.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Distribution of absolute extensors and flexors torque values for men and women.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Distribution of body weight-normalized extensors and flexors torque values for men and women.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Representation of stronger side depending on subjects’ dominance. (SEm, standard error of measurement.)
Fig 4
Fig 4
Distribution of extensors and flexors asymmetry indexes for men and women.
Appendix Fig 1
Appendix Fig 1
Normative values and levels of maximal normalized extensors torque.
Appendix Fig 2
Appendix Fig 2
Normative values and levels of maximal normalized flexors torque.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gokeler A., Dingenen B., Hewett T.E. Rehabilitation and return to sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Where are we in 2022? Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4:e77–e82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Undheim M.B., Cosgrave C., King E., et al. Isokinetic muscle strength and readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is there an association? A systematic review and a protocol recommendation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1305–1310. - PubMed
    1. Maffiuletti N.A., Bizzini M., Desbrosses K., Babault N., Munzinger U. Reliability of knee extension and flexion measurements using the Con-Trex isokinetic dynamometer. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2007;27:346–353. - PubMed
    1. Amiridis I.G., Martin A., Morlon B., et al. Co-activation and tension-regulating phenomena during isokinetic knee extension in sedentary and highly skilled humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;73:149–156. - PubMed
    1. Duchateau J., Enoka R.M. Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: Influence of task constraints. J Physiol. 2008;586:5853–5864. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources