Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 28;15(12):e51234.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.51234. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Acute Pancreatitis: Clinical Profile of 60 Patients

Affiliations

Acute Pancreatitis: Clinical Profile of 60 Patients

Sukhwinder Thakur et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common differential diagnosis of acute pain abdomen and cannot be considered self-limiting as it has serious early and long-term impacts. Depending on severity, AP is divided into mild, moderately severe, and severe AP. Management of AP involves accurate diagnosis, high-quality supportive care, monitoring for early detection and treatment of complications, and prevention of relapse. Aim To assess the etiological risk factors, clinical profile, and complications in patients with AP. Methods The present study was conducted on 60 eligible patients admitted to the Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, and Hospital of Northern India. A diagnosis of AP was established based on the revised Atlanta classification (2012) for the classification of AP, and relevant data were collected and statistically analyzed. Results Most of the AP patients were in the 21-40 year age group. The majority were males (88.3%). Alcohol was the most common etiological factor in 76.7% of patients followed by cholelithiasis in 10% of patients. Pain abdomen was the most common presenting clinical feature occurring in 96.7% of patients and vomiting in 65% of the patients. Acute fluid collection was the most common pancreatic complication occurring in 26.7% of the patients, pancreatic edema was seen in 21.7%, and pancreatic necrosis in 15%. Among extrapancreatic complications, ascites was most commonly seen in 50% of patients followed by pleural effusion in 15%, shock in 15%, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in 15%, and hypocalcemia in 11.7% of patients. Conclusion AP should be one of the differentials for patients presenting with pain abdomen, especially when probable risk factors such as alcohol abuse and cholelithiasis are present. A high index of suspicion to diagnose AP is needed as timely management may prevent systematic complications, thus improving the outcome. Poor prognostic indicators are raised levels of total serum bilirubin, raised serum lipase, reduced serum albumin, and low platelet count among AP patients.

Keywords: acute pancreatitis; alcohol; multi organ dysfunction syndrome; pancreatic necrosis; serum lipase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acute pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment. Szatmary P, Grammatikopoulos T, Cai W, et al. Drugs. 2022;82:1251–1276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management. Beger HG, Rau BM. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17876868/ World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5043–5051. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Gut. 2012;62:102–111. - PubMed
    1. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology; Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl 3:0–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Etiology, clinical profile and outcome of acute pancreatitis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in rural South India: a ten year retrospective study. Ramu R, Paul V, Devipriya S, Philip NC. Int Surg J. 2019;6:3794–3799.

LinkOut - more resources