Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;51(3):612-619.
doi: 10.1111/birt.12816. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

The impact of exclusion due to COVID-19 restrictions on partners' satisfaction with Swedish hospital postnatal ward care: A multi-methods approach

Petrus Olander  1 , Lisa Berglin  2   3 , Elin Naurin  1 , Elias Markstedt  1 , Lucy R Zheng  1 , Karolina Linden  4 , Verena Sengpiel  2   3 , Helen Elden  2   4
Affiliations

The impact of exclusion due to COVID-19 restrictions on partners' satisfaction with Swedish hospital postnatal ward care: A multi-methods approach

Petrus Olander et al. Birth. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: To prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2, hospitals around the world adopted protocols that, in varying ways, resulted in the exclusion of partners from hospital postnatal care wards. The objective of this study was to examine the effect this exclusion had on partners' satisfaction with postnatal care.

Methods: An online survey (the Swedish Pregnancy Panel) including free-text comments was conducted before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic; partners of pregnant women were recruited at an early ultrasound appointment and followed until 2 months after childbirth. Data were linked to the Swedish Pregnancy Register.

Results: The survey was completed by 524 partners of women who gave birth during the pandemic and 203 partners of women who gave birth before. Partners' satisfaction with hospital postnatal care dropped 29.8 percent (-0.94 OLS, 95% CI = -1.17 to -0.72). The drop was largest for partners of first-time mothers (-1.40 OLS, 95% CI = -1.69 to -1.11), but unrelated to clinical outcomes such as mode of birth and most social backgrounds, except higher income. The qualitative analysis showed that partners (1) felt excluded as partners and parents, (2) thought the strain on staff led to deficiencies in the care provided, and (3) perceived the decision about partner restrictions as illogical.

Conclusions: The exclusion of partners from the hospital postnatal wards clearly impaired satisfaction with care, and partners of first-time mothers were particularly affected. Planning for future restrictions on partners from hospital wards should factor in these consequences.

Keywords: COVID‐19 pandemic; Swedish Pregnancy Panel; hospital postnatal ward; partner; satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Krot K, Rudawska I. Is patient satisfaction the key to promote compliance in the health care sector? Econ Sociol. 2019;12(3):291‐300.
    1. Bhanu P. Patient satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3(3):151‐155.
    1. Premberg Å, Hellström AL, Berg M. Experiences of the first year as father. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008;22(1):56‐63.
    1. Larsson B, Thies‐Lagergren L. Partners' expectations and experiences of the project ‘midwife all the way’: a qualitative study. Eur J Midwifery. 2021;5:5‐7.
    1. Xue WL, Shorey S, Wang W, He H‐G. Fathers' involvement during pregnancy and childbirth: an integrative literature review. Midwifery. 2018;62:135‐145.

LinkOut - more resources