Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;26(3):191-199.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01496-8. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

The Dairy and Cancer Controversy: Milking the Evidence

Affiliations
Review

The Dairy and Cancer Controversy: Milking the Evidence

Taylor E Scialo et al. Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Cancer risk reduction remains a significant concern for both individuals with a cancer diagnosis and those aiming to prevent it. Dairy products, a source of beneficial dietary nutrients, have sparked controversy regarding their impact on cancer risk.

Recent findings: Evidence indicates that dairy consumption, particularly milk, can decrease colorectal cancer risk. However, cow's milk, a key dairy product, exposes individuals to growth hormones, notably insulin-like growth factor-1, potentially elevating cancer risk. Extensive research supports the link between dairy intake and heightened prostate cancer risk. Nonetheless, investigations into dairy's association with breast, ovarian, and other cancers yield mixed results. The overall data on dairy and cancer remains inconclusive. Available data suggests that a diet emphasizing fiber-rich foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables, while restricting milk and dairy intake-similar to the Mediterranean dietary pattern-might mitigate cancer incidence. However, further research is crucial to elucidate the precise role of dairy products in overall cancer risk.

Keywords: Cancer; Colorectal Cancer; Dairy; Milk; Prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). National Institutes of Health; 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/all.html . Accessed 26 Nov 2023
    1. Liposits G, Orrevall Y, Kaasa S, Osterlund P, Cederholm T. Nutrition in cancer care: a brief, practical guide with a focus on clinical practice. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(7):e992–8. - DOI
    1. Muscaritoli M, Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Hütterer E, Isenring E, Kaasa S, Krznaric Z. ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in cancer. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2898–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. López-Plaza B, Loria-Kohen V, González-Rodríguez LG, Fernández-Cruz E. Alimentación y estilo de vida en la prevención del cáncer [Diet and lifestyle in cancer prevention]. Nutr Hosp. 2022;39:74–7. Spanish. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.04317 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeClercq V, Nearing JT, Sweeney E. Plant-based diets and cancer risk: what is the evidence? Curr Nutr Rep. 2022;11(2):354–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-022-00409-0 . This review discusses current observational studies showcasing an inverse association between plant based diet and overall cancer risk. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources