Comparison of laser ablation, simple excision, and flap reconstruction in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
- PMID: 38291247
- PMCID: PMC10827894
- DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-03993-5
Comparison of laser ablation, simple excision, and flap reconstruction in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
Abstract
Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common condition that typically affects young adults. PSD may cause significant morbidity due to its chronic nature and tendency to recur. Laser ablation has recently shown promising results in the treatment of PSD, but comparative studies are sparse. We aimed to compare laser ablation with two conventional treatment options: simple excision with direct closure and excision with flap reconstruction. This retrospective study material included patients who underwent PSD surgery in the plastic surgery department of a single academic teaching hospital. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operation technique: laser group, direct closure group, and flap group. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared between the groups including patient characteristics, residual disease, recurrent disease, complications, and re-operations. Among the 278 patients, 66 underwent laser treatment, 134 excision with direct closure, and 78 excision with flap closure. The follow-up time ranged from 15.4 ± 7.6 months in the laser group to 87.6 ± 29.3 months in the flap group. Eventless healing occurred in 67.7% of the patients in the laser group, 66.4% of the patients in the direct closure group, and 56.4% of the patients in the flap group. There was significantly more residual disease in the laser group whereas significantly more complications were found in the direct closure and flap groups. The advantages of laser treatment include fast postoperative recovery and reduced risk of complications.
Keywords: Laser therapy; Pilonidal sinus; Postoperative complications; Simple excision; Surgical flaps.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
How to repair the surgical defect after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a dilemma.J Wound Care. 2014 Dec;23(12):630-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.630. J Wound Care. 2014. PMID: 25492279 Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8. Epub 2008 Oct 21. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18937009
-
Modified Limberg flap technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in teenagers.J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1610-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 26. J Pediatr Surg. 2014. PMID: 25475804
-
A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.Int Wound J. 2019 Oct;16(5):1119-1135. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13163. Epub 2019 Jun 23. Int Wound J. 2019. PMID: 31230414 Free PMC article.
-
Contralateral Limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal disease recurrence.Asian J Surg. 2019 Aug;42(8):787-791. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Asian J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30711442 Review.
Cited by
-
Sinus laser therapy versus Karydakis flap procedure in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative analysis of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 19;29(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03058-3. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 39699772
-
Advancements and Innovations in the Surgical Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus. 2024 May 26;16(5):e61141. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61141. eCollection 2024 May. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38933617 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is it beneficial to add laser ablation to curettage in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease?Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Mar 18;40(1):145. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04409-8. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40100423 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: treatment success, recurrence rates, and patient outcomes.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 16;40(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04525-5. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40522552 Free PMC article.
-
Laser versus rhomboid flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: multi-centre comparative study.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 15;40(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04341-x. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 39953215
References
-
- Søndenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I et al (1995) Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 10(1):39–42. 10.1007/BF00337585 - PubMed
-
- Humphries AE, Duncan JE (2010) Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 90(1):113–124. 10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.006 - PubMed
-
- Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M et al (2018) Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: a review of literature with metanalysis. Surgeon 16(5):315–320. 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.009 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources