Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;42(5):476-486.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01523-x. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions

Affiliations

Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions

Te Ba et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2024 May.

Abstract

Aim: To retrospectively explored whether systematic training in the use of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 on computed tomography (CT) can improve the interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions (FLLs) among different radiologists.

Materials and methods: A total of 18 visiting radiologists and the liver multiphase CT images of 70 hepatic observations in 63 patients at high risk of HCC were included in this study. The LI-RADS v2018 training procedure included three thematic lectures, with an interval of 1 month. After each seminar, the radiologists had 1 month to adopt the algorithm into their daily work. The interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for FLLs among the radiologists before and after training were compared.

Results: After training, the interobserver agreements in classifying the LR categories for all radiologists were significantly increased for most LR categories (P < 0.001), except for LR-1 (P = 0.053). After systematic training, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for LR categorization performance for all participants were significantly increased for most LR categories (P < 0.001), except for LR-1 (P = 0.062).

Conclusion: Systematic training in the use of the LI-RADS can improve the interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for FLLs among radiologists with different levels of experience.

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT); Diagnostic imaging; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS); Liver neoplasm; Training program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xiao J, Wang F, Wong NK, He J, Zhang R, Sun R, et al. Global liver disease burdens and research trends: analysis from a Chinese perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;71(1):212–21. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cao M, Li H, Sun D, Chen W. Cancer burden of major cancers in China: a need for sustainable actions. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020;40(5):205–10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):358–80. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim TH, Kim SY, Tang A, Lee JM. Comparison of international guidelines for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 update. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019;25(3):245–63. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Huang J, Lok V, Ngai CH, Chu C, Patel HK, Thoguluva Chandraseka V, et al. Disease burden, risk factors, and recent trends of liver cancer: a global country-level analysis. Liver Cancer. 2021;10(4):330–45. - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources