Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2538.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53113-0.

The influence of tactical formation on physical and technical performance across playing positions in the Chinese super league

Affiliations

The influence of tactical formation on physical and technical performance across playing positions in the Chinese super league

Wei Zhang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of tactical formations on the physical and technical performance of professional football players in the Chinese Super League (CSL). A sample of 800 games from the 2015-2021 CSL was analyzed, and players' physical (total distance covered, distance covered while ball in play, number of sprints, sprint distance, and high/middle/low-speed running) and technical (gain/loss of possession, ball retention percentage, challenges, challenge success percentage, passes, and pass success percentage) performance was assessed across six team formations: 3-5-2 (n = 137), 4-3-3 (n = 77), 4-2-3-1 (n = 391), 4-4-2 (n = 257), 3-4-3 (n = 41), and 4-1-4-1 (n = 107). Linear mixed models were used to assess variations in performance indicators across positions and formations. The results demonstrated that central defenders traveled significantly more total and low-speed running distances in the 3-5-2 formation than in the 4-2-3-1 formation (ES range: 0.33-0.34, p < 0.01). Fullbacks in the 3-5-2 formation demonstrated more high-speed running than did those in the 4-4-2 formation (ES = 0.27, p = 0.04). The central midfielders exhibited significantly more sprints and longer sprint distances in the 4-2-3-1 formation than in the 4-4-2 formation (ES range: 0.2-0.24, p < 0.01). Regarding technical performance, central defenders displayed significantly greater ball retention percentages, passes, and pass success rates in the 3-4-3 than in the 3-5-2 formations (ES range: 0.58-0.65, p < 0.01). Moreover, fullbacks and central midfielders executed markedly more passes with superior pass success rates in 4-back formations than in 3-5-2 formations (ES range: 0.2-0.53, p < 0.01). These findings can help coaches and academic staff understand the physical and technical requirements of various positions in various tactical formations, thus optimizing the training process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The number of sprints covered by players at different positions across different formations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The sprint distance covered by players at different positions across different formations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The high-speed running covered by players at different positions across different formations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O'Donoghue P. An Introduction to Performance Analysis of Sport. Routledge; 2014.
    1. Bush M, et al. Evolution of match performance parameters for various playing positions in the English Premier League. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2015;39:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vilamitjana JJ, et al. High-intensity activity according to playing position with different team formations in soccer. Acta Gymnica. 2021 doi: 10.5507/ag.2021.003. - DOI
    1. Sarmento H, et al. Match analysis in football: A systematic review. J. Sports Sci. 2014;32(20):1831–1843. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.898852. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forcher L, et al. Center backs work hardest when playing in a back three: The influence of tactical formation on physical and technical match performance in professional soccer. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0265501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265501. - DOI - PMC - PubMed