Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):329.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17832-3.

Canadians' knowledge of cancer risk factors and belief in cancer myths

E Rydz  1   2 , J Telfer  1 , E K Quinn  1   2 , S S Fazel  2 , E Holmes  3 , G Pennycook  4 , C E Peters  5   6   7   8
Affiliations

Canadians' knowledge of cancer risk factors and belief in cancer myths

E Rydz et al. BMC Public Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Many untrue statements about cancer prevention and risks are circulating. The objective of this study was to assess Canadians' awareness of known cancer risk factors and cancer myths (untruths or statements that are not completely true), and to explore how awareness may vary by sociodemographic and cognitive factors.

Methods: Cancer myths were identified by conducting scans of published, grey literature, and social media. Intuitive-analytic thinking disposition scores included were actively open- and close-minded thinking, as well as preference for intuitive and effortful thinking. A survey was administered online to participants aged 18 years and older through Prolific. Results were summarized descriptively and analyzed using chi-square tests, as well as Spearman rank and Pearson correlations.

Results: Responses from 734 Canadians were received. Participants were better at identifying known cancer risk factors (70% of known risks) compared to cancer myths (49%). Bivariate analyses showed differential awareness of known cancer risk factors (p < 0.05) by population density and income, cancer myths by province, and for both by ethnicity, age, and all thinking disposition scores. Active open-minded thinking and preference for effortful thinking were associated with greater discernment. Tobacco-related risk factors were well-identified (> 90% correctly identified), but recognition of other known risk factors was poor (as low as 23% for low vegetable and fruit intake). Mythical cancer risk factors with high support were consuming additives (61%), feeling stressed (52%), and consuming artificial sweeteners (49%). High uncertainty of causation was observed for glyphosate (66% neither agreed or disagreed). For factors that reduce cancer risk, reasonable awareness was observed for HPV vaccination (60%), but there was a high prevalence in cancer myths, particularly that consuming antioxidants (65%) and organic foods (45%) are protective, and some uncertainty whether drinking red wine (41%), consuming vitamins (32%), and smoking cannabis (30%) reduces cancer risk.

Conclusions: While Canadians were able to identify tobacco-related cancer risk factors, many myths were believed and numerous risk factors were not recognized. Cancer myths can be harmful in themselves and can detract the public's attention from and action on established risk factors.

Keywords: Awareness; Cancer; Cancer beliefs; Cancer misinformation; Cancer myths; Thinking disposition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatterplot displaying, for each item, the correlation between overall believability (i.e. the percent agreeing or strongly agreeing with an item, y-axis) and the correlation effect size (Pearson’s r) of the global mean of the thinking disposition score global and response to specific myths and facts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percent breakdown of responses to “to what extent do you agree that the following can increase cancer risk”? (n ~ 400 per factor) *Known risk factors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent breakdown of responses to “to what extent do you agree that the following can reduce cancer risk”? (n ~ 400 per factor) *Known protective factors
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Statistics Canada. Tables 13-10-0394-01. Leading causes of death, total population, by age group. 2022.
    1. Brenner DR, Poirier A, Woods RR, Ellison LF, Billette J-M, Demers AA, et al. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2022. CMAJ. 2022;194(17):E601–7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee in collaboration with the Canadian Cancer Society Statistics Canada. and the Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2021. Can Cancer Stat 2021. 2021;1–95.
    1. Xie L, Semenciw R, Mery L. Cancer incidence in Canada: Trends and projections (1983–2032). Heal Promot Chronic Dis Prev Canada. 2015;35:2–187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: Tobacco smoking, Volume 100E. Lyon, France; 2012.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts