Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 31;51(1):e238162.
doi: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8162.

Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes Among 3 Left Atrial Incisions: Conventional Direct, Transseptal, and Superior Septal Left Atriotomy

Affiliations

Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes Among 3 Left Atrial Incisions: Conventional Direct, Transseptal, and Superior Septal Left Atriotomy

Estelle Démoulin et al. Tex Heart Inst J. .

Abstract

Background: Achieving optimal exposure of the mitral valve during surgical intervention poses a significant challenge. This study aimed to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes associated with 3 left atriotomy techniques in mitral valve surgery-the conventional direct, transseptal, and superior septal approaches-and assess differences during the surgical procedure and the postoperative period.

Methods: Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing mitral valve surgery from January 2010 to December 2020, categorized into 3 cohorts: group 1 (conventional direct; n = 115), group 2 (transseptal; n = 33), and group 3 (superior septal; n = 59). To bolster sample size, the study included patients undergoing mitral valve surgery independently or in conjunction with other procedures (eg, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortictricuspid surgery, or maze procedure).

Results: No substantial variance was observed in the etiology of mitral valve disease across groups, except for a higher incidence of endocarditis in group 3 (P = .01). Group 1 exhibited a higher frequency of elective surgeries and isolated mitral valve procedures (P = .008), along with reduced aortic clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass durations (P = .002). Conversely, group 3 patients represented a greater proportion of emergency procedures (P = .01) and prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stays (P = .001). No significant disparities were detected in terms of permanent pacemaker implantation, postoperative complications, or mortality among the groups.

Conclusion: Mitral valve operations that employed these 3 atriotomy techniques demonstrated a safe profile. The conventional direct approach notably reduced aortic clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass durations. The superior septal method was primarily employed for acute pathologies, with no significant escalation in postoperative arrhythmias or permanent pacemaker implantation, although these patients had prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stays. These outcomes may be linked to the underlying pathology and nature of the surgical intervention rather than the incision method itself.

Keywords: Mitral valve; artificial pacemaker; complications; perioperative period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None.

References

    1. Cohn LH. Fifty years of open-heart surgery. Circulation. 2003;107(17):2168–2170. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000071746.50876.E2. doi: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(3):162–172. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.202. doi: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nienaber JJ, Glower DD. Minitransseptal versus left atrial approach to the mitral valve: a comparison of outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(3):834–839. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.014. discussion 839. doi: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchetta S. Therapeutic news in infective endocarditis. Article in French. Rev Med Suisse. 2016;12(527):1358–1361. - PubMed
    1. Carballo S, Rossel A Carballo. Diagnostic et prise en charge précoce des endocardites infectieuses. Rev Med Suisse. 2012;8(358):1966–1971. - PubMed

MeSH terms