Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;41(3):693-702.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03039-3. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

Correlation of self-reported racial background to euploidy status and live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles

Affiliations

Correlation of self-reported racial background to euploidy status and live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles

Tamar Alkon-Meadows et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the embryonic euploidy rate and live birth outcomes following single, euploid embryo transfer (SEET) differ among women of self-reported racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all infertile patients of different self-reported racial backgrounds who underwent In vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and an autologous single euploid embryo transfer (SEET) from December 2015 to December 2019 at a single private and academic assisted reproduction technology center. Primary outcome measures included ploidy rates among different racial groups. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, and live birth rates.

Results: Five thousand five hundred sixty-two patients who underwent an IVF cycle with ICSI-PGT-A were included. A total of 24,491 blastocysts were analyzed. White participants had on average more euploid embryos and higher euploidy rates when compared to their counterparts (p ≤ 0.0001). However, after controlling for confounding factors, there was no association between race and the odds of having a higher euploidy rate (aOR 1.31; 95% CI 0.63-2.17, p = 0.42). A total of 4949 patients underwent SEET. Pregnancy outcomes did not differ among patients of varying self-reported races.

Conclusions: Euploidy rates and pregnancy outcomes were comparable among patients of different racial backgrounds who underwent a SEET.

Keywords: Euploidy; In vitro fertilization; Live birth rate; Preimplantation genetic testing; Self-reported racial background.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. AC is an advisor and/or board member of Progyny. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart showing the distribution of women who completed an IVF+PGT cycle

References

    1. Feinberg EC, Larsen FW, Catherino WH, Zhang J, Armstrong AY. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):888–894. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jain T. Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):876–881. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandra, Anjani, Casey E. Copen, and Elizabeth H. Stephen. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. No. 2013. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, 2013. - PubMed
    1. Seifer DB, Zackula R, Grainger DA. Trends of racial disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in black women compared with white women: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 1999 and 2000 vs. 2004-2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):626–35. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.084. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McQueen DB, Schufreider A, Lee SM, Feinberg EC, Uhler ML. Racial disparities in in vitro fertilization outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):398–402.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.012. - DOI - PubMed