A Prospective, Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology
- PMID: 38296330
- PMCID: PMC11298234
- DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11584
A Prospective, Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal suctioning causes discomfort, is associated with adverse effects, and is resource-demanding. An artificial secretion removal method, known as an automated cough, has been developed, which applies rapid, automated deflation, and inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff during the inspiratory phase of mechanical ventilation. This method has been evaluated in the hands of researchers but not when used by attending nurses. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of the method over the course of patient management as part of routine care.
Methods: This prospective, longitudinal, interventional study recruited 28 subjects who were intubated and mechanically ventilated. For a maximum of 7 d and on clinical need for endotracheal suctioning, the automatic cough procedure was applied. The subjects were placed in a pressure-regulated ventilation mode with elevated inspiratory pressure, and automated cuff deflation and inflation were performed 3 times, with this repeated if deemed necessary. Success was determined by resolution of the clinical need for suctioning as determined by the attending nurse. Adverse effects were recorded.
Results: A total of 84 procedures were performed. In 54% of the subjects, the artificial cough procedure was successful on > 70% of occasions, with 56% of all procedures considered successful. Ninety percent of all the procedures were performed in subjects who were spontaneously breathing and on pressure-support ventilation with peak inspiratory pressures of 20 cm H2O. Rates of adverse events were similar to those seen in the application of endotracheal suctioning.
Conclusions: This study solely evaluated the efficacy of an automated artificial cough procedure, which illustrated the potential for reducing the need for endotracheal suctioning when applied by attending nurses in routine care.
Keywords: Tracheal secretions; artificial cough; endotracheal suctioning; mechanical ventilation.
Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs Karbing and Rees are shareholders of AW Technologies, who manufacture the TrachFlush system evaluated in this study. The other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Turner JS, Briggs SJ, Springhorn HE, Potgieter PD. Patients' recollection of intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med 1990;18(9):966-968. - PubMed
-
- Maggiore SM, Lellouche F, Pignataro C, Girou E, Maitre B, Richard J-CM, et al. Decreasing the adverse effects of endotracheal suctioning during mechanical ventilation by changing practice. Respir Care 2013;58(10):1588-1597. - PubMed
-
- Blakeman TC, Scott JB, Yoder MA, Capellari E, Strickland SL. ARRC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Artificial Airway Suctioning. Respir Care 2022;67(2):258-271. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical