Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 31;15(12):e51422.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.51422. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review

Affiliations

Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review

Ernesto Calderon Martinez et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

This article introduces a concise 10-step guide tailored for researchers engaged in systematic reviews within the field of medicine and health, aligning with the imperative for evidence-based healthcare. The guide underscores the importance of integrating research evidence, clinical proficiency, and patient preferences. It emphasizes the need for precision in formulating research questions, utilizing tools such as PICO(S)(Population Intervention Comparator Outcome), PEO (Population Exposure Outcome), SPICE (setting, perspective, intervention/exposure/interest, comparison, and evaluation), and SPIDER (expectation, client group, location, impact, professionals, service and evaluation), and advocates for the validation of research ideas through preliminary investigations. The guide prioritizes transparency by recommending the documentation and registration of protocols on various platforms. It highlights the significance of a well-organized literature search, encouraging the involvement of experts to ensure a high-quality search strategy. The critical stages of screening titles and abstracts are navigated using different tools, each characterized by its specific advantages. This diverse approach aims to enhance the effectiveness of the systematic review process. In conclusion, this 10-step guide provides a practical framework for the rigorous conduct of systematic reviews in the domain of medicine and health. It addresses the unique challenges inherent in this field, emphasizing the values of transparency, precision, and ongoing efforts to improve primary research practices. The guide aims to contribute to the establishment of a robust evidence base, facilitating informed decision-making in healthcare.

Keywords: guide; methodology; platforms; systematic review; tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Boolean operators
Boolean operators help break down and narrow down the search. "AND" will narrow your search so you get fewer results. It tells the database that your search results must include every one of your search terms. "OR" means MORE results. OR tells the database that you want results that mention one or both of your search terms. "NOT" means you are telling the database that you wish to have information related to the first term but not the second. Image credits to authors of the articles (Created on www.canva.com)

References

    1. Sampieri-Cabrera R, Calderon-Martinez E. Mexico: Zenodo; 2022. Correlatos biopsicosociales en la educación médica del siglo XXI: de la teoría a la práctica.
    1. Tenny S, Varacallo M. United States: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Evidence based medicine. - PubMed
    1. About the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. [ Dec; 2023 ];https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/about-cdsr 8:2023.
    1. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. BMJ. 2021;372:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. PROSPERO. [ Dec; 2023 ]; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ 8:2023.

LinkOut - more resources