Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Apr 15;30(8):1488-1500.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2978.

A Phase I Study of Acapatamab, a Half-life Extended, PSMA-Targeting Bispecific T-cell Engager for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Phase I Study of Acapatamab, a Half-life Extended, PSMA-Targeting Bispecific T-cell Engager for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Tanya Dorff et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Safety and efficacy of acapatamab, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) x CD3 bispecific T-cell engager were evaluated in a first-in-human study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Patients and methods: Patients with mCRPC refractory to androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy received target acapatamab doses ranging from 0.003 to 0.9 mg in dose exploration (seven dose levels) and 0.3 mg (recommended phase II dose) in dose expansion intravenously every 2 weeks. Safety (primary objective), pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity (secondary objectives) were assessed.

Results: In all, 133 patients (dose exploration, n = 77; dose expansion, n = 56) received acapatamab. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event seen in 97.4% and 98.2% of patients in dose exploration and dose expansion, respectively; grade ≥ 3 was seen in 23.4% and 16.1%, respectively. Most CRS events were seen in treatment cycle 1; incidence and severity decreased at/beyond cycle 2. In dose expansion, confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses (PSA50) were seen in 30.4% of patients and radiographic partial responses in 7.4% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1). Median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0-4.9], radiographic PFS per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.0-5.4). Acapatamab induced T-cell activation and increased cytokine production several-fold within 24 hours of initiation. Treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies were detected in 55% and impacted serum exposures in 36% of patients in dose expansion.

Conclusions: Acapatamab was safe and tolerated and had a manageable CRS profile. Preliminary signs of efficacy with limited durable antitumor activity were observed. Acapatamab demonstrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T. Dorff reports consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, and Sanofi; receipt of equipment/materials/drugs/medical writing/gifts or other services from Pfizer.

L.G. Horvath reports research funding from Astellas Pharma, travel/accommodation from Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, and Bayer, honoraria from Janssen, Astellas, and Bayer and is on the scientific advisory board for Imagion.

K. Autio reports research funds paid to her institution for this trial conduct from Amgen and research funds paid to her institution for trial conduct from Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy outside of the submitted work.

A. Bernard-Tessier reports consulting fees from Novartis-AAA, Janssen, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures/presentations/speakers’ bureaus/manuscript writing or educational events from Orion, Bayer, and Astellas; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Orion and Novartis-AAA.

M.B. Rettig reports grants or contracts to his institution from NCI, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Progenics; personal consulting fees from Amgen Inmune Bio, Ambryx, AstraZeneca, Myovant, Milagen, Roivant-Oncopeia; personal payment or honoraria for lectures/presentations/speakers’ bureaus/manuscript writing or educational events from Bayer and Janssen; patents planned, issued or pending for ‘Inhibitors of the N-terminal Domain of the Androgen Receptor’; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Myovant; leadership or fiduciary role in Aravalent, Oncovalent, and Suvalent.

J-P Machiels reports consulting fees to the institution from Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Innate, Merck Serono, Boerhinger, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Janssen, Incyte, Cue Biopharma, ALX Oncology, iTEOS, eTheRNA, NEKTAR, F-Star, Seagen, Genmab, Astellas, CureVac, and MSD; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Gilead, and Sanofi; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Psioxus; leadership or fiduciary role as Chair of the EORTC Head and Neck Group.

M.A Bilen has acted as a paid consultant for and/or as a member of the advisory boards of Exelixis, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Calithera Biosciences, Genomic Health, Nektar, EMD Serono, SeaGen, and Sanofi and has received grants to his institution from Amgen, Merck, Xencor, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, SeaGen, Incyte, Nektar, AstraZeneca, Tricon Pharmaceuticals, Genome & Company, AAA, Peloton Therapeutics, and Pfizer for work performed outside of the current study.

N. Adra reports grant or research support from Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Aventis, Genentech, Inc., Natera; membership on advisory committees or review panels/board membership in Merck and Company, Inc.; advisory roles for Astellas, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Aventis, Aveo, and Sanofi-Aventis.

S. Rottey reports support for the present manuscript in the form of study material, medical writing assistance, and payment for trial conduct from Amgen; travel support for congresses from MSD and Ipsen; and participation in data safety monitoring boards on behalf of her institution.

R. Greil reports consulting fees from Celgene, Novartis, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, MSD, Merck, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures/presentations/speakers’ bureaus/manuscript writing or educational events from Celgene, Roche,Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Sandoz, Abbvie, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Amgen, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Celgene, Gilead, BMS, Abbvie, and Daiichi Sankyo; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Celgene, Novartis, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Merck, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi; stock or stock options in Novo Nordisk and Lilly.

H. Matsubara reports payment or honoraria as an invited speaker from Sanofi; consultancy fees from Janssen, MSD, and Eli Lilly; research grants to his institution from Janssen; AstraZeneca; Bayer, MSD, Taiho, Astellas, Amgen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, Seagen, Chugai, Abbvie, and Novartis.

D.S.W Tan reports grants or contracts to his institution outside of the submitted work from ACM Biolabs, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer and Pfizer; consulting fees to his institution from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, DKSH, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda outside of the submitted work; payment or honoraria to his institution for lectures/presentations/speakers’ bureaus/manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Takeda.

H. Uemura reports grants or contracts from Bayer, Takeda, and Kissei outside of the submitted work; payment or honoraria for lectures/presentations/speakers’ bureaus/manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Bayer, Sanofi, Astellas, AstraZeneca, and Takeda; other financial or non-financial interests in Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Astellas.

C. Lemech reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen.

J. Meran reports payment or honoraria for lectures/presentations/speakers’ bureaus/manuscript writing or educational events from Bayer, BMS, Astellas, Roche, and MSD; support for attending meetings and/or travel from PharmaMar.

M.P Lolkema, Y. Yu, M. Minocha, M. McComb, H. Penny, X. Hu, and T. Eggert are employees of Amgen, the sponsor of this trial, and hold stock/ stock options in Amgen.

V. Gupta reports being a past employee of Amgen and holding stock/stock options in Amgen as a past employee.

H. Kouros-Mehr reports support for this manuscript from when employed by Amgen, grants or contracts from when employed by Amgen, support for attending meetings and/or travel from when employed by Amgen, holds patents planned, issued or pending from when employed by Amgen, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board when employed by Amgen, and stock or stock option when employed by Amgen.

M.M.J. Amsbury reports support for this manuscript when employed by Amgen, grants or contracts while employed by Amgen, support for attending meetings and/or travel when employed by Amgen, and stock or stock option when employed by Amgen.

B. Tran reports research grants to his institution from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche Genentech; personal consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, IQVIA, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Tolmar; personal payments or honoraria for presentations from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Merck, and Pfizer.

A. Wong has no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prostate-specific antigen response with acapatamab in dose expansion Figure 1A. Best (unconfirmed) PSA response after treatment initiation, shown as percentage change from baseline for each of the 54 patients with post-baseline PSA measurements. Figure 1B. Prostate-specific antigen response 12 weeks after acapatamab initiation shown as percentage change from baseline for patients (n = 23) in the PSA response evaluable set in dose expansion. The PSA response evaluable set included all subjects that enrolled and received at least one dose of acapatamab, had measurable (>0) baseline PSA levels and had the opportunity to be followed for at least 9 weeks starting from study day 1 and included patients who discontinued treatment prior to the 9-week time point as long as the data cut-off date was at least 9 weeks after cycle 1 day 1 of acapatamab treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association of baseline tumor volume with prostate-specific antigen response and pharmacodynamics associated with acapatamab therapy Figure 2. Panel A: Higher baseline tumor PSMA expression was associated with PSA50 responses. Panels 2B, 2C, and 2D: Acapatamab induces T-cell activation in patients and higher levels of T cell differentiation in responders. Panel A shows the baseline PSMA maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and baseline tumor volume as measured by PSMA-PET/CT and FDG-PET/CT in patients with and without a PSA50 response. Number of patients assessed by PSMA-PET/CT = 45; < PSA50 = 34; > PSA50 = 11; the number of patients assessed by FDG-PET/CT = 41; < PSA50 = 31; > PSA50 = 10. Patients in Panel B, C, and D received a 3-day eIV infusion of 0.09 mg acapatamab in week 1, followed by 0.3 mg of IV acapatamab (target dose), administered over 1h every 2 weeks starting in week 2. Panel B shows the changes from baseline in the percentage of activated (CD69+) CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (n = 62). The blue line represents mean ± standard error. Grey lines represent data from individual patients. Panel C shows cytokine induction following acapatamab infusion within the first infusion period (n = 63). Data are shown as fold change from baseline. Blue lines represent mean ± standard error. Grey lines represent data from individual patients. Panel D shows the ratio of change in the number of different T cell subsets by PSA50 response from baseline at cycle 2, day 1 prior to next acapatamab infusion (< PSA50, n = 11; > PSA50, n = 26) for flow cytometry analysis. Changes in T cell numbers are shown relative to baseline. Abbreviations: C: cycle; CM: central memory; D: day; EM: effector memory; HR: hour; pre: pre-acapatamab infusion; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; TEMRA: effector memory T cells re-expressing CD45RA

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer: World Health Organization. Cancer Fact Sheets. [cited 2022 Oct 5]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/27-Prostate-fact-sheet....
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72(1):7–33. doi 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirby M, Hirst C, Crawford ED. Characterising the castration-resistant prostate cancer population: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 2011;65(11):1180–92. doi 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02799.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halabi S, Kelly WK, Ma H, Zhou H, Solomon NC, Fizazi K, et al. Meta-Analysis evaluating the impact of site of metastasis on overall survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(14):1652–9. doi 10.1200/jco.2015.65.7270. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moreira DM, Howard LE, Sourbeer KN, Amarasekara HS, Chow LC, Cockrell DC, et al. Predicting time from metastasis to overall survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from SEARCH. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017;15(1):60–6. e2. doi 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.08.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances