Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;79(6):638-649.
doi: 10.1111/anae.16222. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

Predicting time to asystole following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a systematic review

Affiliations
Free article

Predicting time to asystole following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a systematic review

C Nicolson et al. Anaesthesia. 2024 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

The planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is a common practice in the intensive care unit for patients where ongoing organ support is recognised to be futile. Predicting the time to asystole following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is crucial for setting expectations, resource utilisation and identifying patients suitable for organ donation after circulatory death. This systematic review evaluates the literature for variables associated with, and predictive models for, time to asystole in patients managed on intensive care units. We conducted a comprehensive structured search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Studies evaluating patients managed on adult intensive care units undergoing withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment with recorded time to asystole were included. Data extraction and PROBAST quality assessment were performed and a narrative summary of the literature was provided. Twenty-three studies (7387 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Variables associated with imminent asystole (<60 min) included: deteriorating oxygenation; absence of corneal reflexes; absence of a cough reflex; blood pressure; use of vasopressors; and use of comfort medications. We identified a total of 20 unique predictive models using a wide range of variables and techniques. Many of these models also underwent secondary validation in further studies or were adapted to develop new models. This review identifies variables associated with time to asystole following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and summarises existing predictive models. Although several predictive models have been developed, their generalisability and performance varied. Further research and validation are needed to improve the accuracy and widespread adoption of predictive models for patients managed in intensive care units who may be eligible to donate organs following their diagnosis of death by circulatory criteria.

Keywords: asystole; prediction; time; treatment; withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Avidan A, Sprung CL, Schefold JC, et al. Variations in end‐of‐life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus‐2): a prospective observational study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2021; 9: 1101–1110.
    1. Dhanani S, Hornby L, van Beinum A, et al. Resumption of cardiac activity after withdrawal of life‐sustaining measures. New England Journal of Medicine 2021; 384: 345–352.
    1. Lomero M, Gardiner D, Coll E, et al. Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape. Transplant International 2020; 33: 76–88.
    1. Scales NB, Herry C, Van Beinum A, et al. Predicting time to death after the withdrawal of life supporting therapies using variability analysis of vital signs waveform data. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2019; 66: S96–S100.
    1. Coleman NL, Brieva JL, Crowfoot E. Prediction of death after withdrawal of life‐sustaining treatments. Critical Care and Resuscitation 2008; 10: 278–284.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources