Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Apr 10;42(11):1288-1300.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01214. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in g BRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in g BRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer

Patricia A Ganz et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2, high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment.

Methods: Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive.

Results: One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status.

Conclusion: Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02032823.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram: OlympiA PRO Study. PRO, patient-reported outcomes.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
FACIT-Fatigue score change from baseline over time by treatment group for patients (A) who have completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and (B) who have completed adjuvant chemotherapy: OlympiA PRO Study. FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0-52 with higher score indicating less fatigue. FACIT-Fatigue, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; PRO, patient-reported outcomes.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
EORTC QLQ-C30 scores over time by treatment and chemotherapy subgroup for Global Health Status ((A) neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (B) adjuvant chemotherapy), Physical scale ((C) neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (D) adjuvant chemotherapy), and Emotional scale ((E) neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (F) adjuvant chemotherapy): OlympiA PRO Study. EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Score, Physical and Emotional subscale scores range from 0-100, higher score indicates better quality of life, or functioning. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item; PRO, patient-reported outcomes; QOL, quality of life.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
EORTC QLQ-C30 scores change from baseline over time by treatment and chemotherapy subgroup for nausea and vomiting symptom ((A) neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (B) adjuvant chemotherapy) and diarrhea symptom ((C) neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (D) adjuvant chemotherapy): OlympiA PRO Study. EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and vomiting and Diarrhea symptoms scale scores range from 0-100, higher score indicate worse symptom. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item; PRO, patient-reported outcomes.

Comment in

References

    1. Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B, et al. Adjuvant olaparib for patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2394–2405. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donovan KA, Jacobsen PB, Andrykowski MA, et al. Course of fatigue in women receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28:373–380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrykowski MA, Schmidt JE, Salsman JM, et al. Use of a case definition approach to identify cancer-related fatigue in women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6613–6622. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, et al. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: Occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:743–753. - PubMed
    1. Bower JE, Wiley J, Petersen L, et al. Fatigue after breast cancer treatment: Biobehavioral predictors of fatigue trajectories. Health Psychol. 2018;37:1025–1034. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data