Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51509.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.51509. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Gynecomastia on Thoracic Computed Tomography

Affiliations

Gynecomastia on Thoracic Computed Tomography

Muhammed Akif Deniz et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objective Gynecomastia is a benign proliferation of ductal epithelium in the retroareolar region in male patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of gynecomastia in male patients who underwent thoracic computed tomography (CT) imaging at our clinic, assess possible causes, highlight the imaging characteristics of gynecomastia, and compare our findings with the literature. Materials and methods Male patients over 18 years of age who underwent thoracic CT imaging in our clinic were included in the study. Patients were initially assessed based on age and the presence of gynecomastia. The patients with gynecomastia were evaluated in terms of age, gynecomastia localization (right, left, and bilateral), gynecomastia type (nodular, dentritic, and diffuse), and possible etiology. Results The study included 1500 patients with a mean age of 45.6±21.7 years, and 470 (31.3%) patients had gynecomastia. Gynecomastia was on the right side in 11.3%, on the left side in 11.1%, and bilateral in 77.7% of the patients. Gynecomastia was nodular in 52.1%, dendritic in 35.3%, and diffuse in 17.2% of the patients. The causative factor could not be identified in 44.3% of the patients with gynecomastia. Among cases where the etiology was identified (56.7%), the most common factors were cancer (23.4%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (13.2%), and chronic hepatitis B (10.7%). Conclusion When evaluating thoracic CT, the breast area, in addition to the lungs, chest wall, and bone structures, should also be evaluated carefully. With the increased use of thoracic CT scans, incidentally detected gynecomastia in patients is also on the rise. Knowing the presence of gynecomastia is very important for the clinician to determine the etiology and treat the underlying disease. Therefore, detecting and reporting gynecomastia on thoracic CT can prevent unnecessary advanced breast imaging methods and play a very important role in treating the underlying etiology.

Keywords: cancer; computed tomography; gynecomastia; male breast imaging; thorax.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A 61-year-old patient with chronic kidney failure and dendritic-type gynecomastia in the retroareolar region of both breasts (marked with an arrow)
Figure 2
Figure 2. A 76-year-old patient with prostate cancer and diffuse-type gynecomastia in the retroareolar region of both breasts (marked with an arrow)
Figure 3
Figure 3. A 53-year-old patient with chronic hepatitis B and nodular-type gynecomastia in the retroareolar region of both breasts (marked with an arrow)

References

    1. Clinical practice. Gynecomastia. Braunstein GD. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1229–1237. - PubMed
    1. Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Johnson RE, Murad MH. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:1010–1015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imaging in gynecomastia. Billa E, Kanakis GA, Goulis DG. Andrology. 2021;9:1444–1456. - PubMed
    1. Incidental gynecomastia on thoracic computed tomography in clinical practice: characteristics, radiologic features, and correlation with possible causes in South Korean men. Kim MS, Kim JH, Lee KH, Suh YJ. Am J Mens Health. 2020;14:1557988320908102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. EAA clinical practice guidelines-gynecomastia evaluation and management. Kanakis GA, Nordkap L, Bang AK, et al. Andrology. 2019;7:778–793. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources