Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 2;409(1):50.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03239-6.

Results of robotic liver surgery in association with IWATE criteria - the first 100 cases

Kira C Steinkraus  1 , Benno Traub  1 , Patrick Heger  1 , Marin Zaimi  1 , Andre L Mihaljevic  1   2 , Christoph W Michalski  1   3 , Marko Kornmann  1 , Felix J Hüttner  4   5
Affiliations

Results of robotic liver surgery in association with IWATE criteria - the first 100 cases

Kira C Steinkraus et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Aim of the current study was to present the results of the implementation phase of a robotic liver surgery program and to assess the validity of the IWATE difficulty score in predicting difficulty and postoperative complications in robotic liver surgery.

Methods: Based on the prospective database of the Interdisciplinary Robotic Center of Ulm University Hospital, the first 100 robotic liver surgeries were identified and analyzed. Perioperative parameters (duration of surgery and blood loss) and postoperative parameters including morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay were assessed and the results were compared between different IWATE difficulty categories.

Results: From November 2020 until January 2023, 100 robotic liver surgeries were performed (41 female, 59 male; median age 60.6 years, median BMI 25.9 kg/m2). Median duration of surgery was 180 min (IQR: 128.7), and median blood loss was 300 ml (IQR: 550). Ninety-day mortality was 2%, and overall morbidity was 21%, with major complications occurring in 13% of patients (≥ grade 3 according to Clavien/Dindo). A clinically relevant postoperative biliary leakage was observed in 3 patients. Posthepatectomy liver failure occurred in 7% (4 Grade A, 3 Grade B). Duration of surgery (p < 0.001), blood loss (p < 0.001), CCI (p = 0.004), overall morbidity (p = 0.004), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.001) were significantly increased in the IWATE 'expert' category compared to lower categories.

Discussion: Robotic surgery offers a minimally invasive approach for liver surgery with favorable clinical outcomes, even in the implementation phase. In the current study the IWATE difficulty score had the ability to predict both difficulty of surgery as well as postoperative outcomes when assessing the complexity of robotic liver surgery. Therefore, the role of the IWATE score in predicting these outcomes highlights its importance as a tool in surgical planning and decision-making.

Keywords: IWATE criteria; Robotic liver surgery; Surgical site infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Boxplot displaying duration of surgery (minutes) for different IWATE categories (p < 0.001)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation of IWATE criteria with Clavien-Dindo major morbidity (> grade 2) (p = 0.105)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E. Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutrition. 2015;5(4):311–321. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2015.10.05. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–629. - PubMed
    1. Zwart MJW, Görgec B, Arabiyat A, Nota CLM, van der Poel MJ, Fichtinger RS, et al. Pan-European survey on the implementation of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive liver surgery. HPB. 2022;24(3):322–331. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.939. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(4):281–289. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, et al. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery. 2019;165(4):731–740. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012. - DOI - PubMed