Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Apr;35(4):921-923.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05736-0. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

Robotic-assisted intravesical mesh excision following retropubic midurethral sling

Affiliations
Case Reports

Robotic-assisted intravesical mesh excision following retropubic midurethral sling

Elizabeth J Olive et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Intravesical mesh is an uncommon complication following synthetic midurethral sling placement. Management options have included endoscopic techniques such as laser ablation or surgical excision. We present our technique for robotic-assisted excision of intravesical mesh following a retropubic midurethral sling.

Methods: The patient is a 66-year-old woman with a remote history of laser ablation of intraurethral mesh after midurethral sling, and persistent symptomatic intravesical mesh with associated stone at the bladder neck and right bladder wall. Robotic excision of the intravesical mesh and stone was performed by entering the space of Retzius, carrying the dissection along the right arm of the retropubic sling, performing two cystotomies to free and remove the mesh, and finally closing the cystotomies in two layers.

Results: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. A cystogram prior to catheter removal showed no extravasation and a competent bladder neck. She reported no new stress incontinence and had improvement in overactive bladder symptoms.

Conclusions: Robotic excision of intravesical mesh after synthetic midurethral sling was safely performed in this patient who had multiple areas of intravesical mesh. Management aspects reported here may be helpful for complex presentations of intravesical mesh.

Keywords: Complication; Intravesical mesh; Mesh erosion; Midurethral sling; Robotic excision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association. Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):679–94. - DOI
    1. Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Synthetic midurethral slings: roles, outcomes, and complications. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(1):17–30. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karim SS, Pietropaolo A, Skolarikos A, et al. Role of endoscopic management in synthetic sling/mesh erosion following previous incontinence surgery: a systematic review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists (YAU) and Uro-technology (ESUT) groups. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(1):45–53. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):567–91. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ogle CA, Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Holmium laser excision for urinary mesh erosion: a minimally invasive treatment with favorable long-term results. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1645–8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources