Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 3;42(1):69.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04716-1.

Neurological sphincter deficiency: is there a place for artificial urinary sphincter?

Desiree Vrijens  1 , Harry Kendall  2 , François Hervé  3
Affiliations
Review

Neurological sphincter deficiency: is there a place for artificial urinary sphincter?

Desiree Vrijens et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Neurogenic stress urinary incontinence (N-SUI) is a condition with serious impact on the quality of life. There are several treatment modalities of which the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) stands out as the most suitable technique for addressing sphincter insufficiency. In this article, the purpose is to describe practical considerations, outcomes, and complications of the artificial urinary sphincter in neurological sphincter deficiency in both males and females.

Methods: A narrative review of the current literature.

Results: The outcomes of AUS are reasonably good in patients with NLUTD, the surgical technique is discussed as well as the limitations and special considerations in this complex and heterogeneous patient population.

Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that its efficacy and functional durability may be lower in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) compared to those without neurological deficits. However, studies have shown that AUS can still provide effective and safe continence outcomes in both male and female patients, with long-term device survival rates ranging from several years to over a decade.

Keywords: Artificial urinary sphincter; Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction; Neurogenic stress incontinence; Sphincter deficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D et al (2016) Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-Urology. Eur Urol 69:324–333. 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.07.071 - PubMed
    1. Musco S, Ecclestone H, ’t Hoen L et al (2022) Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Treatments for Neurogenic Stress Urinary Incontinence in Adults A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 8:1090–1102. 10.1016/J.EUF.2021.08.007 - PubMed
    1. Farag F, Doherty R, Arlandis S (2020) Female neurogenic stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Urol 30:496–500. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000785 - PubMed
    1. Light JK, Scott FB (1983) Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 130:1127–1129. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)51719-X - PubMed
    1. Guillot-Tantay C, Chartier-Kastler E, Mozer P et al (2018) Traitement de l’incontinence urinaire masculine neurologique par le sphincter urinaire artificiel AMS 800TM (Boston Scientific, Boston, États-Unis): résultats à très long terme (> 25 ans). Progrès en Urol 28:39–47. 10.1016/J.PUROL.2017.09.012 - PubMed