Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):171.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11905-7.

Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET

Affiliations

Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET

Robert Olson et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience.

Methods: This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival.

Discussion: This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.

Keywords: Cancer; Oligometastases; Quality of Life; Single Fraction; Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RO has received grant funding from Varian Medical Systems, related to the current study, as well as speaker fees from Astra Zeneca and works in a consultant role with equity from Need Inc, both unrelated to the current work.

SB has received speaker’s honoraria from Astra Zeneca.

BM has received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Meyers Squibb, and Amgen.

AL has received honoraria from Astra Zeneca for speaker’s bureau and advisory board participation.

DP reports a Clinician-Scientist Grant from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, royalties from Uptodate.com, and a consultant role with equity from Need Inc, all unrelated to the current work.

All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study schema

References

    1. Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(1):8–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel PH, Palma D, McDonald F, Tree AC. The dandelion dilemma revisited for oligoprogression: treat the whole lawn or weed selectively? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019;31(12):824–33. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rowe SP, Tran PT, Fishman EK, Johnson PT. Oligoprogression: what radiologists need to know about this emerging concept in cancer therapeutic decision-making. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(7):898–900. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan OSH, Lam KC, Li JYC, Choi FPT, Wong CYH, Chang ATY, et al. ATOM: A phase II study to assess efficacy of preemptive local ablative therapy to residual oligometastases of NSCLC after EGFR TKI. Lung Cancer. 2020;142:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schellenberg D, Gabos Z, Duimering A, Debenham BJ, Fairchild A, Huang F, et al. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligo-Progressive Cancers: Results of the Randomized Phase II STOP Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;117(2, Supplement):S58. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources