Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 21:2:11217.
doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11217. eCollection 2023.

The Utility of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Emergency Management of Femoral Hernias: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Utility of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Emergency Management of Femoral Hernias: A Systematic Review

Paul Shuttleworth et al. J Abdom Wall Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Femoral hernias are a relatively rare type of hernia but have a high complication rate, with a high proportion either presenting as an emergency or requiring emergency management. Minimal access surgery has been shown to be safe, with good results, in an elective setting, but there is little published evidence of its utility in an emergency. Methods: A systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, OVID, Embase, and Cochrane reviews for ((Femoral hernia) AND (laparoscop* OR minimal access OR robotic)) AND (strangulat* OR obstruct* OR incarcerat*). Results: 286 manuscripts were identified of which 33 were relevant. 24 were individual case reports, 3 case series, 4 cohort studies or case control series, and 2 high level reviews of National registers. Conclusion: Minimal access surgery can avoid an unnecessary laparotomy for the assessment of hernial contents, especially via a TAPP approach. Minimal access repair of femoral hernias as an emergency is feasible and can be done safely with results similar to open surgery but good quality evidence is lacking.

Keywords: emergency; emergent groin hernia; femoral hernia; laparoscopic surgery; minimal invasive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prisma Diagram, from (43).

References

    1. Humes DJ, Radcliffe RS, Camm C, West J. Population-based Study of Presentation and Adverse Outcomes after Femoral Hernia Surgery. Br J Surg (2013) 100(13):1827–32. 10.1002/bjs.9336 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coelho JCU, Hajar FN, Moreira GA, Hosni AVE, Saenger BF, Aguilera YSH, et al. Femoral Hernia: Uncommon, but Associated with Potentially Severe Complications. Arq Bras Cir Dig (2021) 34(2):e1603. 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1603 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sorelli PG, El-Masry NS, Garrett WV. Open Femoral Hernia Repair: One Skin Incision for All. World J Emerg Surg (2009) 4:44. 10.1186/1749-7922-4-44 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, Imamura M, Ahmed I, Ramsay G, et al. Open versus Laparoscopic Repair of Inguinal Hernia: an Overview of Systematic Reviews of Randomised Controlled Trials. Surg Endosc (2022) 36(7):4685–700. 10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR. Low Recurrence Rate after Laparoscopic (TEP) and Open (Lichtenstein) Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized, Multicenter Trial with 5-year Follow-Up. Ann Surg (2009) 249(1):33–8. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819255d0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources