Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 17;87(8):325-341.
doi: 10.1080/15287394.2024.2311170. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

Pulmonary evaluation of whole-body inhalation exposure of polycarbonate (PC) filament 3D printer emissions in rats

Affiliations

Pulmonary evaluation of whole-body inhalation exposure of polycarbonate (PC) filament 3D printer emissions in rats

Mariana T Farcas et al. J Toxicol Environ Health A. .

Abstract

During fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing with polycarbonate (PC) filament, a release of ultrafine particles (UFPs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) occurs. This study aimed to determine PC filament printing emission-induced toxicity in rats via whole-body inhalation exposure. Male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to a single concentration (0.529 mg/m3, 40 nm mean diameter) of the 3D PC filament emissions in a time-course via whole body inhalation for 1, 4, 8, 15, and 30 days (4 hr/day, 4 days/week), and sacrificed 24 hr after the last exposure. Following exposures, rats were assessed for pulmonary and systemic responses. To determine pulmonary injury, total protein and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, surfactant proteins A and D, total as well as lavage fluid differential cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were examined, as well as histopathological analysis of lung and nasal passages was performed. To determine systemic injury, hematological differentials, and blood biomarkers of muscle, metabolic, renal, and hepatic functions were also measured. Results showed that inhalation exposure induced no marked pulmonary or systemic toxicity in rats. In conclusion, inhalation exposure of rats to a low concentration of PC filament emissions produced no significant pulmonary or systemic toxicity.

Keywords: 3D printer emitted nanoparticles; Thermoplastics; inhalation toxicology; printer emissions; pulmonary toxicity; systemic markers; thermal decomposition; volatile organic compounds (VOC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Representative images of PC 3D printer-emitted particles onto filters. The surface morphology and elemental composition were analyzed using FE-SEM.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Representative images of PC 3D printer-emitted particles deposited in the alveolar region at days 1 and 30 of exposure. The images were taken using FE-SEM. A: air-control; B,C,D, and E: day 1 of exposure; F, G, H, and I: day 30 of exposure.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Representative images of cellular uptake of PC 3D printer-emitted particles in BAL cells at days 1 and 30 of exposure by TEM. A: air-control; B and C: day 1 of exposure; D and E: day 30 of exposure.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Biomarkers of pulmonary injury in BALF. A: LDH activity; B: total protein. The rats were exposed for 1, 4, 8, 15, and 30 days to air or PC 3D printer emissions and euthanized at 24 hr post last exposure. Values represents means ± SEMs; N = 6.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Biomarkers of alveolar epithelium injury. A: SPA; B: SPD. The rats were exposed for 1, 4, 8, 15, and 30 days to air or PC 3D printer emissions and euthanized at 24 hr post last exposure. Values represents means ± SEMs; N = 6.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Biomarker of pulmonary damage in BAL. A: total cells; B: macrophages; C: neutrophils; D: lymphocytes; E: eosinophils. The rats were exposed for 1, 4, 8, 15, and 30 days to air or PC 3D printer emissions and euthanized at 24 hr post last exposure. Values represents means ± SEMs; N = 6.

References

    1. Alijagic A, Engwall M, Sarndahl E, Karlsson H, Hedbrant A, Andersson L, Karlsson P, et al. 2022. “Particle Safety Assessment in Additive Manufacturing: From Exposure Risks to Advanced Toxicology Testing.” Frontiers in Toxicology 4:836447. 10.3389/ftox.2022.836447. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anjilvel S, and Asgharian B. 1995. “A Multiple-Path Model of Particle Deposition in the Rat Lung.” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology: Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology 28 (1): 41–50. 10.1006/faat.1995.1144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azimi P, Zhao D, Pouzet C, Crain NE, and Stephens B. 2016. “Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments.” Environmental Science and Technology 50 (3): 1260–1268. 10.1021/acs.est.5b04983. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blaauboer BJ 2008. “The Contribution of in vitro Toxicity Data in Hazard and Risk Assessment: Current Limitations and Future Perspectives.” Toxicology Letters 180 (2): 81–84. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boonruksa P, Bello D, Zhang J, Isaacs JA, Mead JL, and Woskie SR. 2017. “Exposures to Nanoparticles and Fibers During Injection Molding and Recycling of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Polycarbonate Composites.” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 27 (4): 379–390. 10.1038/jes.2016.26. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources