Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 5;47(1):74.
doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02306-2.

Risk factor analysis of changes in blood flow in the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery after flow-diverter coverage of it

Affiliations

Risk factor analysis of changes in blood flow in the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery after flow-diverter coverage of it

WuLin Ma et al. Neurosurg Rev. .

Abstract

Few studies have explored the effect of a flow-diverter device (FD) on blood flow in the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), after treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the bifurcation region of the internal carotid artery (ICA). The main objective of this article is to investigate the factors that affect A1 blood flow after FD covers the A1 artery. This is a single-center, retrospective study. Data were collected retrospectively from our center, and patients whose FDs were placed for treatment from the terminal of the ICA to the M1 segment were analyzed. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Immediate post-procedural angiography following device placement revealed decreased blood flow in the A1 of 15 (35.7%) patients and complete occlusion of the A1 segment in 11 (26.2%) patients. During an average follow-up period of 9.8 months, the A1 segment was ultimately occluded in 25 patients (59.5%) and decreased blood flow in 4 patients (9.5%). When using FD to cover the A1 artery for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, patients with preoperative opening of the anterior communicating artery (AcomA) are more prone to occlusion or decreased blood flow of the A1 artery, compared to patients without opening.

Keywords: A1; Anterior communicating artery; Flow diverter; Occlusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M et al (2015) Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 28(4):365–375 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Ugga L et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a single center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158(9):1745–1755 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Ugga L et al (2017) Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 Flow Modulation Device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 9(1):70–76 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J et al (2015) Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(1):98–107 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Lubicz B, Van der Elst O, Collignon L, Mine B, Alghamdi F (2015) Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(3):542–546 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources