Family functioning in students of health sciences in four Latin American countries: a study of the structure and factorial invariance of the FACES III scale. A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38315293
- PMCID: PMC10844165
- DOI: 10.1186/s41155-024-00287-1
Family functioning in students of health sciences in four Latin American countries: a study of the structure and factorial invariance of the FACES III scale. A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Psychometric studies of the FACES III scale in Spanish-speaking countries show a lack of agreement on the factorial structure of the scale. In addition, most of the studies have only performed exploratory analyses of its factorial structure.
Objective: The objective of the present study was to confirm the structure and factorial invariance of the FACES III scale in nursing and obstetric students from Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico.
Methods: A total of 3303 students from the four countries participated in this study (Colombia = 1559, Chile = 1224, Peru = 215, Mexico = 305).
Results: The results of the study showed that the Bi-factor model presents the best-fit indexes to the data from Colombia, Chile, and Mexico, but not from Peru. In addition, it was found that this model showed evidence of being strictly invariant among the three countries in the sequence of the invariance models proposed: metric invariance (ΔRMSEA = .000), scalar (ΔRMSEA = .008), and strict (ΔRMSEA = .008). The bi-factor model also showed adequate reliability indexes in the three countries.
Conclusion: It is concluded that the FACES III scale shows adequate psychometric performance under a bi-factor model in nursing and obstetric students from Colombia, Chile, and Mexico. The lack of fit of the model in Peru could be associated with the small sample size.
Keywords: Adaptability; Cohesion; Confirmatory factor analysis; FACES III; Factorial Invariance; Family functioning.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Bader M, Jobst LJ, Moshagen M. Sample size requirements for bifactor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2022;29(5):772–783. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2021.2019587. - DOI
-
- Bazo-Álvarez JC, Bazo-Alvarez OA, Aguila J, Peralta F, Mormontoy W, Bennett IM. Psychometric properties of the third version of family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales (faces-III): A study of Peruvian adolescents. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica. 2016;33(3):462–470. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2016.333.2299. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beavers R, Hampson RB. The beavers systems model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy. 2000;22(2):128–143. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.00143. - DOI
-
- Boer D, Hanke K, He J. On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2018;49(5):713–734. doi: 10.1177/0022022117749042. - DOI
-
- Brajsa-zganec A, Lipovcan LK, Ivanovic D, Prizmic Z. Well-being of nursing students: Role of affect regulation, self-esteem, family cohesion and social support. The Open Public Health Journal. 2017;10:69–79. doi: 10.2174/1874944501710010069. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources