Proposed revision of the American Association for Surgery of Trauma Renal Organ Injury Scale: Secondary analysis of the Multi-institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study
- PMID: 38319246
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004232
Proposed revision of the American Association for Surgery of Trauma Renal Organ Injury Scale: Secondary analysis of the Multi-institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study
Abstract
Background: This study updates the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale (OIS) for renal trauma using evidence-based criteria for bleeding control intervention.
Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective study including patients with high-grade renal trauma from seven level 1 trauma centers from 2013 to 2018. All eligible patients were assigned new renal trauma grades based on revised criteria. The primary outcome used to measure injury severity was intervention for renal bleeding. Secondary outcomes included intervention for urinary extravasation, units of packed red blood cells transfused within 24 hours, and mortality. To test the revised grading system, we performed mixed-effect logistic regression adjusted for multiple baseline demographic and trauma covariates. We determined the area under the curve (AUC) to assess accuracy of predicting bleeding interventions from the revised grading system and compared this to 2018 AAST OIS.
Results: Based on the 2018 OIS grading system, we included 549 patients with AAST grades III to V injuries and computed tomography scans (III, 52% [n = 284]; IV, 45% [n = 249]; and V, 3% [n = 16]). Among these patients, 89% experienced blunt injury (n = 491), and 12% (n = 64) underwent intervention for bleeding. After applying the revised grading criteria, 60% (n = 329) of patients were downgraded, and 4% (n = 23) were upgraded; 2.8% (n = 7) downgraded from grade V to IV, and 69.5% (n = 173) downgraded from grade IV to III. The revised renal trauma grading system demonstrated improved predictive ability for bleeding interventions (2018 AUC, 0.805; revised AUC, 0.883; p = 0.001) and number of units of packed red blood cells transfused. When we removed urinary injury from the revised system, there was no difference in its predictive ability for renal hemorrhage intervention.
Conclusion: A revised renal trauma grading system better delineates the need for hemostatic interventions than the current AAST OIS renal trauma grading system.
Level of evidence: Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level III.
Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
References
-
- Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL, McAninch JW, Browner BD, Champion HR, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma . 1989;29(12):1664–1666.
-
- Kozar RA, Crandall M, Shanmuganathan K, Zarzaur BL, Coburn M, Cribari C, et al. Organ injury scaling 2018 update: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2018;85(6):1119–1122.
-
- Ballon-Landa E, Raheem OA, Fuller TW, Kobayashi L, Buckley JC. Renal trauma classification and management: validating the revised renal injury grading scale. J Urol . 2019;202(5):994–1000.
-
- Buckley JC, McAninch JW. Revision of current American Association for the Surgery of Trauma renal injury grading system. J Trauma . 2011;70(1):35–37.
-
- Keihani S, Rogers DM, Putbrese BE, Anderson RE, Stoddard GJ, Nirula R, et al. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma renal injury grading scale: implications of the 2018 revisions for injury reclassification and predicting bleeding interventions. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;88(3):357–365.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials