Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;2(8):EVIDoa2300023.
doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300023. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

Artificial Intelligence Predictive Model for Hormone Therapy Use in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence Predictive Model for Hormone Therapy Use in Prostate Cancer

Daniel E Spratt et al. NEJM Evid. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiotherapy can benefit patients with localized prostate cancer. However, ADT can negatively impact quality of life, and there remain no validated predictive models to guide its use. METHODS: We used digital pathology images from pretreatment prostate tissue and clinical data from 5727 patients enrolled in five phase 3 randomized trials, in which treatment was radiotherapy with or without ADT, as our data source to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)–derived predictive patient-specific model that would determine which patients would develop the primary end point of distant metastasis. The model used baseline data to provide a binary output that a given patient will likely benefit from ADT or not. After the model was locked, validation was performed using data from NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9408 (n=1594), a trial that randomly assigned men to radiotherapy plus or minus 4 months of ADT. Fine–Gray regression and restricted mean survival times were used to assess the interaction between treatment and the predictive model and within predictive model–positive, i.e., benefited from ADT, and –negative subgroup treatment effects. RESULTS: Overall, in the NRG/RTOG 9408 validation cohort (14.9 years of median follow-up), ADT significantly improved time to distant metastasis. Of these enrolled patients, 543 (34%) were model positive, and ADT significantly reduced the risk of distant metastasis compared with radiotherapy alone. Of 1051 patients who were model negative, ADT did not provide benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Our AI-based predictive model was able to identify patients with a predominantly intermediate risk for prostate cancer likely to benefit from short-term ADT. (Supported by a grant [U10CA180822] from NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, a grant [UG1CA189867] from NCI Community Oncology Research Program, a grant [U10CA180868] from NRG Oncology Operations, and a grant [U24CA196067] from NRG Specimen Bank from the National Cancer Institute and by Artera, Inc. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT00767286, NCT00002597, NCT00769548, NCT00005044, and NCT00033631.)

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Flow Diagram for NRG/RTOG 9408 (Validation Set). RT denotes radiotherapy; and ST-ADT, short-term androgen deprivation therapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative Incidence in the Validation Cohort (NRG/RTOG 9408) of Histopathology-Imaged Patients by Artificial Intelligence–Predictive Model Subgroups for (Panel A) Distant Metastasis and (Panel B) Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality. CI denotes confidence interval; DM, distant metastasis; Est., estimated; PCSM, prostate cancer–specific mortality; RT, radiotherapy; and ST-ADT, short-term androgen deprivation therapy. * Denotes P value <0.05.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest Plots for All End Points in Positive and Negative Predictive Model Groups of NRG/RTOG 9408 (Validation Set) for All Patients. ADT denotes androgen deprivation therapy; CI, confidence interval; DM, distant metastasis; N, number of patients; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; PCSM, prostate cancer–specific mortality; RMST, restricted mean survival time; RT, radiation therapy; ST-ADT, short-term androgen deprivation therapy; and yr, year. * Denotes P value <0.05.

Update of

References

    1. Jones CU, Pugh SL, Sandler HM, et al. Adding short-term androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy in men with localized prostate cancer: long-term update of the NRG/RTOG 9408 randomized clinical trial [published correction appears in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023;115:265]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022;112:294–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pilepich MV, Winter K, Lawton CA, et al. Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma — long-term results of phase III RTOG 85–31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:1285–1290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Amico AV, Chen M-H, Renshaw A, Loffredo M, Kantoff PW. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2015;314:1291–1293. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.8577. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolla M, Neven A, Maingon P, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation in prostate cancer: 12-year results of EORTC Trial 22991 in patients with localized intermediate-risk disease. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:3022–3033. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00855. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kishan AU, Sun Y, Hartman H, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy use and duration with definitive radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol 2022;23:e319]. Lancet Oncol 2022;23: 304–316. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00705-1. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data