Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;11(3):1411-1421.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14693. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

Investigating the relationship between FRailty And Quality of LIfe in patients with heart faiLure and CKD (FRAIL study)

Affiliations

Investigating the relationship between FRailty And Quality of LIfe in patients with heart faiLure and CKD (FRAIL study)

Thomas McNally et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Aims: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) are disproportionally affected by frailty, an independent predictor of morbidity. The prevalence of frailty and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in a unique population of patients with both CKD and HF (CKD-HF) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between frailty and QoL in patients with CKD-HF.

Methods and results: Patients were identified from a tertiary care cardiorenal clinic. Eligible patients had CKD-HF with a stable estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.732. Data were collected from each participant at one point in time using surveys delivered by study personnel between 14 July 2022 and 31 March 2023. Frailty was defined as Modified Frailty Phenotype (MFP) score ≥3. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess QoL. Demographic data were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. Demographics and QoL were compared between frail and non-frail cohorts using Pearson's R and Student's t-test (two-tailed, alpha-priori = 0.05). One hundred five participants consented, and 103 completed the questionnaires in full. Amongst the 103 participants, 49.5% (n = 51) were frail. Frailty was related to sex (P = 0.021) and medication count (P = 0.007), however not to other clinical measures, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.437) and ejection fraction (P = 0.911). Frail patients reported poorer QoL across physical functioning (P < 0.001), general health (P < 0.001), bodily pain (P = 0.004), social functioning (P < 0.001), and energy levels (P < 0.001), however not emotional wellbeing (P = 0.058); 51.5% cited 'better quality of life' as their healthcare priority, over longer survival (23.3%) or avoiding hospital admissions (22.3%). This was consistent across frail and non-frail groups.

Conclusions: A large proportion of CKD-HF patients are frail, regardless of disease severity, and more susceptible to significantly poorer QoL across physical and social domains. Improving QoL is the priority of patients across both frail and non-frail cohorts, further emphasizing the need for prompt recognition of frailty as well as possible intervention and prevention.

Keywords: Chronic kidney failure; Frailty; Heart failure; Observational; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funding source had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphs representing the relationship between frailty and several parameters of HR‐QOL: energy, general health, physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, and mental health.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphs representing the relationship between chronic kidney disease stages and several parameters of HR‐QOL: general health, energy, physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, and emotional wellbeing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphs representing the relationship between numbers of medications and several parameters of HR‐QOL: general health, energy, physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, and emotional wellbeing.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Participants order of priority when asked to prioritize ‘Longer Survival’, ‘Better Quality of Life’ or ‘Reduced Hospital Admissions’. The majority of respondents (53%) cited ‘Better Quality of Life’ as their first priority, when it came to planning their healthcare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eriksson D, Goldsmith D, Teitsson S, Jackson J, Nooten F. Cross‐sectional survey in CKD patients across Europe describing the association between quality of life and anaemia. BMC Nephrol 2016;17:97. doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0312-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lesyuk W, Kriza C, Kolominsky‐Rabas P. Cost‐of‐illness studies in heart failure: A systematic review 2004‐2016. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2018;18: doi:10.1186/s12872-018-0815-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. House AA, Wanner C, Sarnak MJ, Piña IL, McIntyre CW, Komenda P. Heart failure in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int 2019;95:1304‐1317. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2019.02.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kottgen A, Russell SD, Loehr LR, Crainiceanu CM, Rosamond WD, Chang PP. Reduced kidney function as a risk factor for incident heart failure: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:1307‐1315. doi:10.1681/ASN.2006101159 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguyen M, Rumjaun S, Lowe‐Jones R, Ster IC, Rosano G, Anderson L, et al. Management and outcomes of heart failure patients with CKD: Experience from an inter‐disciplinary clinic. ESC Heart Fail 2020;7:3225‐3230. doi:10.1002/ehf2.12796 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms