Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 15;16(1):98-108.
doi: 10.62347/UVCX1997. eCollection 2024.

Relationship between anion gap and in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients with liver failure: a retrospective propensity score matching analysis

Affiliations

Relationship between anion gap and in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients with liver failure: a retrospective propensity score matching analysis

Wei Yu et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Objectives: To elucidate the association between anion gap (AG) and in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients with liver failure.

Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics of intensive care patients with liver failure in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database were collected, and binomial logistic and Cox regression was conducted to investigate the association between AG and in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was conducted to characterize the performance of AG in predicting in-hospital mortality, and was compared with the albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) and the End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted for in-hospital survival analysis of AG and patients with liver failure. The propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to mitigate selection bias.

Results: AG was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients with liver failure. Before PSM, the AUCs of AG, ACAG, and MELD were 0.666, 0.682, and 0.653, respectively. After PSM, the AUCs of AG, ACAG, and MELD scores were 0.645, 0.657, and 0.645, respectively, and there is no difference in the predictive performance of the three indicators upon comparison. Compared with the low-AG (≤20 mmol/L) group, the hazard ratio (HR) for in-hospital death of the high-AG (>20 mmol/L) group was determined to be 2.1472 (before PSM)/1.8890 (after PSM).

Conclusions: AG is associated with in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients with liver failure and demonstrates a moderate predictive value, which is comparable to the predictive power of the MELD score. AG may serve as an indirect marker of in-hospital mortality of patients with liver failure by reflecting the degree of metabolic acidosis.

Keywords: Anion gap; MIMIC-IV; in-hospital mortality; liver failure; propensity score matching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart. ICU = Intensive Care Unit, AG = Anion Gap.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves of AG, ACAG, and MELD (before the propensity score matching). ROC = Receiver the Operating Characteristic, AG = Anion Gap, ACAG = Albumin Corrected Anion Gap, MELD = Model for End-stage Liver Disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves of AG, ACAG, and MELD (after the propensity score matching). ROC = Receiver the Operating Characteristic, AG = Anion Gap, ACAG = Albumin Corrected Anion Gap, MELD = Model for End-stage Liver Disease.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier survival curves by AG category (before the propensity score matching, log-rank P<0.0001). AG = Anion Gap.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier survival curves by AG category (after the propensity score matching, log-rank P<0.0001). AG = Anion Gap.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2019;27:18–26. - PubMed
    1. Bernuau J, Rueff B, Benhamou JP. Fulminant and subfulminant liver failure: definitions and causes. Semin Liver Dis. 1986;6:97–106. - PubMed
    1. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, D’Amico G, Dickson ER, Kim WR. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33:464–470. - PubMed
    1. Batra Y, Acharya SK. Acute liver failure: prognostic markers. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22(Suppl 2):S66–68. - PubMed
    1. Peláez-Luna M, Martinez-Salgado J, Olivera-Martinez MA. Utility of the MAYO End-Stage Liver Disease score, King’s College Criteria, and a new in-hospital mortality score in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in acute liver failure. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:927–929. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources