Relationship between soft tissue dimensions and tomographic radial root position classification system for immediate implant installation
- PMID: 38324124
- DOI: 10.1007/s10266-023-00897-8
Relationship between soft tissue dimensions and tomographic radial root position classification system for immediate implant installation
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between soft tissue dimensions and radial root position (RRP) classification for immediate implant placement on maxillary anterior teeth. Maxillary anterior teeth (n = 420) were analyzed in the radial plane of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Each tooth was classified according to its RRP: class I, (IA, IB); class II (IIA, IIB) class III; class IV, and class V. Soft tissue thickness at different landmarks, supracrestal soft tissue height, and crestal bone thickness were measured in CBCT. Keratinized tissue width was clinically measured. Gingival phenotype (thick or thin) was evaluated by transparency of the periodontal probe and at the landmark 2 mm from the gingival margin in CBCT. Class I tooth position accounted for 31.7%, class II for 45%, class III for 13.3%, class IV for 0.5%, and class V for 9.5%. The gingival phenotype was associated with RRP (χ2 test, p < 0.05). Soft tissue dimensions were significantly different over RRP classes (ANOVA and Tukey tests, p < 0.05). Types IA and IIA presented both thick soft and hard tissues. When planning immediate implants in the anterior maxilla, soft tissue dimensions evaluation should be incorporated into RRP classification to increase the accuracy and predictability of treatment outcomes.
Keywords: 3-D imaging; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Gingiva; Immediate implants; Phenotype.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University.
Similar articles
-
Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT classification for immediate implant placement.J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jul;120(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Nov 29. J Prosthet Dent. 2018. PMID: 29195817
-
Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography.Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Jul;79:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Arch Oral Biol. 2017. PMID: 28279824
-
Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):873-6. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011. PMID: 21841998
-
Relationship between anterior maxillary tooth sagittal root position and periodontal phenotype: a clinical and tomographic study.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1309-1321. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04105-1. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34529147
-
The use of digital technologies in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation - A narrative review on planning, measurements, monitoring and aesthetics.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Aug;35(8):922-938. doi: 10.1111/clr.14238. Epub 2024 Feb 2. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024. PMID: 38308466 Review.
References
-
- Noelken R, Geier J, Kunkel M, Jepsen S, Wagner W. Influence of soft tissue grafting, orofacial implant position, and angulation on facial hard and soft tissue thickness at immediately inserted and provisionalized implants in the anterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20:674–82. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources