The use of copper as plant protection product contributes to environmental contamination and resulting impacts on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions
- PMID: 38324154
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-32145-z
The use of copper as plant protection product contributes to environmental contamination and resulting impacts on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions
Erratum in
-
Correction to: The use of copper as plant protection product contributes to environmental contamination and resulting impacts on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(8):4929. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36012-3. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 39888526 No abstract available.
Abstract
Copper-based plant protection products (PPPs) are widely used in both conventional and organic farming, and to a lesser extent for non-agricultural maintenance of gardens, greenspaces, and infrastructures. The use of copper PPPs adds to environmental contamination by this trace element. This paper aims to review the contribution of these PPPs to the contamination of soils and waters by copper in the context of France (which can be extrapolated to most of the European countries), and the resulting impacts on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity, as well as on ecosystem functions. It was produced in the framework of a collective scientific assessment on the impacts of PPPs on biodiversity and ecosystem services in France. Current science shows that copper, which persists in soils, can partially transfer to adjacent aquatic environments (surface water and sediment) and ultimately to the marine environment. This widespread contamination impacts biodiversity and ecosystem functions, chiefly through its effects on phototrophic and heterotrophic microbial communities, and terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates. Its effects on other biological groups and biotic interactions remain relatively under-documented.
Keywords: Collective scientific assessment; Fungicide; Invertebrates; Microbial communities; Sediments; Soil; Trace metal; Water.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Role of trophic interactions in transfer and cascading impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity: a literature review.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2993-3031. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35190-w. Epub 2024 Oct 18. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 39422865 Review.
-
Main conclusions and perspectives from the collective scientific assessment of the effects of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services along the land-sea continuum in France and French overseas territories.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2757-2772. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26952-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 37099095
-
Improved assessment of the impacts of plant protection products on certain soil ecosystem services requires better consideration of terrestrial microalgae and cyanobacteria.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2786-2793. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31198-w. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 38010548 Review.
-
Neglected impacts of plant protection products on invertebrate aquatic biodiversity: a focus on eco-evolutionary processes.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2847-2856. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32767-3. Epub 2024 Mar 9. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 38459285 Review.
-
Linking ecotoxicological effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions to impairment of ecosystem services is a challenge: an illustration with the case of plant protection products.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2773-2785. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29128-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 37548787
References
-
- Abiven D, Boudesocque S, Guillon E, Couderchet M, Dumonceau J, Aplincourt M (2006) Sorption of the herbicide terbumeton and its metabolites onto soils. Influence of copper(II). Environ Chem 3:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1071/en05060 - DOI
-
- Akcha F, Coquillé N, Sussarellu R et al (2022) Trophic transfer of copper decreases the condition index in Crassostrea gigas spat in concomitance with a change in the microalgal fatty acid profile and enhanced oyster energy demand. Total Sci Environ 824:153841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153841 - DOI
-
- Amossé J, Bart S, Brulle F et al (2020) A two years field experiment to assess the impact of two fungicides on earthworm communities and their recovery. Ecotox Environ Saf 203:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110979 - DOI
-
- Amossé J, Bart S, Pery ARR, Pelosi C (2018) Short-term effects of two fungicides on enchytraeid and earthworm communities under field conditions. Ecotoxicology 27:300–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1895-7 - DOI
-
- Anatole-Monnier L (2014) Effets de la contamination cuprique des sols viticoles sur la sensibilité de la vigne à un cortège de bioagresseurs. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01198938/file/MONNIER_LAETITIA_2014... . Accessed 10 Jan 2024
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources