Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 8:152:e36.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000220.

COVID-19 passenger screening to reduce travel risk and translocation of disease

Affiliations

COVID-19 passenger screening to reduce travel risk and translocation of disease

Lindsay L Waite et al. Epidemiol Infect. .

Abstract

Aviation passenger screening has been used worldwide to mitigate the translocation risk of SARS-CoV-2. We present a model that evaluates factors in screening strategies used in air travel and assess their relative sensitivity and importance in identifying infectious passengers. We use adapted Monte Carlo simulations to produce hypothetical disease timelines for the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 for travelling passengers. Screening strategy factors assessed include having one or two RT-PCR and/or antigen tests prior to departure and/or post-arrival, and quarantine length and compliance upon arrival. One or more post-arrival tests and high quarantine compliance were the most important factors in reducing pathogen translocation. Screening that combines quarantine and post-arrival testing can shorten the length of quarantine for travelers, and variability and mean testing sensitivity in post-arrival RT-PCR and antigen tests decrease and increase with the greater time between the first and second post-arrival test, respectively. This study provides insight into the role various screening strategy factors have in preventing the translocation of infectious diseases and a flexible framework adaptable to other existing or emerging diseases. Such findings may help in public health policy and decision-making in present and future evidence-based practices for passenger screening and pandemic preparedness.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR; airport; aviation; disease transmission; pandemic; quarantine; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare none.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Reduction in point-prevalence from a destination with a high point-prevalence across different independent screening strategies ordered left to right by the least to greatest reduction in prevalence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relationship between the standard deviation of testing sensitivity (a) and mean sensitivity (b) in dual testing scenarios (on the y-axis) for simulation when both tests were carried out on the day of arrival or post-arrival and the number of days between the first and second test on the x-axis.

References

    1. Air Transport Bureau (2022) Effects of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis. International Civil Aviation Organization.
    1. Tabares DA (2021) An airport operations proposal for a pandemic-free air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management 90, 101943. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bielecki M, et al. (2021) Air travel and COVID-19 prevention in the pandemic and peri-pandemic period: A narrative review. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 39, 101915. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell TW, et al. (2021) Effect of internationally imported cases on internal spread of COVID-19: A mathematical modelling study. The Lancet Public Health 6, e12–e20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun X, Wandelt S and Zhang A (2021) Delayed reaction towards emerging COVID-19 variants of concern: Does history repeat itself? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 152, 203–215. - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts