Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;13(3):e6930.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6930. Epub 2024 Feb 7.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Pathologic response rates but not tumor size, has an independent prognostic impact on survival

Affiliations

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Pathologic response rates but not tumor size, has an independent prognostic impact on survival

Gilles Houvenaeghel et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: We investigated the pathologic complete response rates (pCR) and survival outcomes of early breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) over 14 years at a French comprehensive cancer center and reported pCR and survival outcomes by tumor subtypes and size.

Methods: From January 2005 to December 2018, 1150 patients receiving NAC were identified. Correlations between cT stage, breast tumor response, axillary lymph node response, pCR, surgery, and outcomes were assessed. pCR was defined as (ypT0/ypTis) and (ypN0/pN0sn).

Results: A pCR was reached in 31.7% (365/1150) of patients and was strongly associated with tumor subtypes, but not with tumor size (pretreatment cT category). Luminal-B Her2-negative and triple-negative (TN) subtypes, cN1 status, older age, and no-pCR had an independent negative prognostic value. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were not significantly different for cT0-1 compared to cT2 stages. In Cox-model adjusted on in-breast pCR and pN status, ypN1 had a strong negative impact (OS, RFS, and MFS: HR = 3.153, 4.677, and 6.133, respectively), higher than no in-breast pCR (HR = 2.369, 2.252, and 2.323). A negative impact of no pCR on OS was observed for cN0 patients and TN tumors (HR = 4.972) or HER2-positive tumors (HR = 11.706), as well as in Luminal-B Her2-negative tumors on MFS (HR = 2.223) and for Luminal-A on RFS (HR = 4.465) and MFS (HR = 4.185).

Conclusion: Achievement of pCR, but not tumor size (pretreatment cT category), has an independent prognostic impact on survival. These results suggest potential NAC benefits in patients with small tumors (<2 cm), even in absence of clinically suspicious lymph nodes. Residual lymph node disease after NAC is the most powerful adverse prognostic factor.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02869607.

Keywords: breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathologic response; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alexandre de Nonneville declares Consulting fees by Gilead, Seagen, Lilly, and Novartis, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events by Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, and MSD, Support for attending meetings and/or travel by Gilead, Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo. Emmanuelle Charaffe declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events by Exact Science (to institution), Veracyte (to institution), and AstraZeneca. Anthony Gonçalves declares Support for attending meetings and/or travel by Menarini, Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board by Novartis, MSD, and Daiichi Sankyo. No conflict of interest was declared by others authors.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Overall survival (OS), (B) recurrence free survival (RFS), and (C) metastases free survival (MFS) according to pCR in multivariate analysis. HR, Hazard ratio; pCR, pathologic complete response.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Overall survival according to cT stage in multivariate analysis for patients with cN0 triple negative (A) and Her2‐positive tumors (B).

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209‐249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taucher S, Steger GG, Jakesz R, et al. The potential risk of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients—results from a prospective randomized trial of the Austrian breast and colorectal cancer study group (ABCSG‐07). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112(2):309‐316. - PubMed
    1. Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine‐year results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B‐18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96‐102. - PubMed
    1. van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ, Julien JP, Tubiana‐Hulin M, Vandervelden C, Duchateau L. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(22):4224‐4237. - PubMed
    1. Powles TJ, Hickish TF, Makris A, et al. Randomized trial of chemoendocrine therapy started before or after surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(3):547‐552. doi:10.1200/JCO.1995.13.3.547 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data