Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 24:12:1272193.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1272193. eCollection 2024.

Prevalence and factors associated with maternal and neonatal sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence and factors associated with maternal and neonatal sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fatoumata Bintou Traoré et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with maternal and neonatal sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis used the PRISMA guideline on sepsis data in sub-Saharan Africa. The bibliographic search was carried out on the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, African Index Medicus, and Google Scholar. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were screened for potentially relevant studies. The last search was conducted on 15 October 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment checklist was applied for critical appraisal. Estimates of the prevalence of maternal and neonatal sepsis were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the Q statistic and the I2 statistic. The funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to assess the publication bias.

Results: A total of 39 studies were included in our review: 32 studies on neonatal sepsis and 7 studies on maternal sepsis. The overall pooled prevalence of maternal and neonatal sepsis in Sub-Saharan Africa was 19.21% (95% CI, 11.46-26.97) and 36.02% (CI: 26.68-45.36), respectively. The meta-analyses revealed that Apgar score < 7 (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6-3.5), meconium in the amniotic fluid (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.8-4.5), prolonged rupture of membranes >12 h (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.9-4.1), male sex (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4), intrapartum fever (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-3.7), and history of urinary tract infection in the mother (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.4-5.2) are factors associated with neonatal sepsis. Rural residence (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.01-10.9), parity (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7), prolonged labor (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-6.9), and multiple digital vaginal examinations (OR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.3-14.3) were significantly associated with maternal sepsis.

Conclusion: The prevalence of maternal and neonatal sepsis was high in sub-Saharan Africa. Multiple factors associated with neonatal and maternal sepsis were identified. These factors could help in the prevention and development of strategies to combat maternal and neonatal sepsis. Given the high risk of bias and high heterogeneity, further high-quality research is needed in the sub-Saharan African context, including a meta-analysis of individual data.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022382050).

Keywords: associated factors; maternal sepsis; neonatal sepsis; prevalence; sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram describing the results of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pooled prevalence of maternal sepsis in SSA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis in SSA.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plot showing publication bias in maternal sepsis studies.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot showing publication bias d in neonatal sepsis studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galvão A, Braga AC, Gonçalves DR, Guimarães JM, Braga J. Sepsis during pregnancy or the postpartum period. J Obstet Gynaecol. (2016) 36:735–43. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2016.1148679 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Otu A, Nsutebu EF, Hirst JE, Thompson K, Walker K, Yaya S. How to close the maternal and neonatal sepsis gap in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health. (2020) 5:e002348. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002348, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sands K, Spiller OB, Thomson K, Portal EAR, Iregbu KC, Walsh TR. Early-onset neonatal Sepsis in low- and middle-income countries: current challenges and future opportunities. Infect Drug Resist. (2022) 15:933–46. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S294156, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assemie MA, Alene M, Yismaw L, Ketema DB, Lamore Y, Petrucka P, et al. . Prevalence of neonatal Sepsis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Pediatr. (2020) 2020:e6468492: 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2020/6468492 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kendle AM, Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Louis JM. Delivery-associated sepsis: trends in prevalence and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2019) 220:391.e1–391.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.002, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types